THE ORGANIZATION’S PURPOSE: MISSION, VISION, VALUES, AND GOALS
5 criteria that comprise good (quality) Mission statements; and5 criteria that comprise good (quality) Vision statements.Visit the corporate website of the Coca-Cola Company, and read the organization’s Mission and Vision statements: http://www.coca-colacompany.com/our-company/mission-vision-valuesUsing the specific criteria that you listed in Item #1 above, critique the Mission and Vision statements of the Coca-Cola Company as follows:Mission Statement: Is the organization’s Mission statement a “good” Mission statement? Why or why not? Justify your answer using your 5 chosen criteria. Be specific!Vision Statement: Is the organization’s Vision statement a “good” Vision statement? Why or why not? Justify your answer using your 5 chosen criteria. Be specific!Finally, find the company’s Values statement: Conclude your paper with an analysis of the company’s Values statement: What do Coca-Cola’s values say about the organization’s sense of ethics?B. Assignment should be a minimum of 5 pages in length. You are required to use APA formatting and you are required to cite and reference your sources. There should be a minimum of three (3) reputable sources cited and referenced in your paper (at least two of your sources must be different from the sources provided.[supanova_question]
Practice Assignment Purpose: To determine the type of documentation style used in
Purpose: To determine the type of documentation style used in your chosen field of study and practice setting up a document in that style.
Investigate Documentation Styles:
Visit this website and determine which style your field uses, or which style you want to use for the duration of the course: http://subjectguides.library.american.edu/c.php?g=175008&p=1154150
Set up a Document in Your Chosen Style:
Following the conventions of your chosen style (if MLA, APA, CMS, or CSE) as shown in Writer’s Help, set up a new document in your word processor.
Write a Paragraph:
Write a paragraph in which you introduce yourself, your field of study, and identify your documentation style. Also included information on the type of writing you’ve done most often in your career or in your study of your career choice while in college.
Save the Document: Firstname Lastname P 1
Upload the Document: Upload the document to the Practice Assignment Link in Submit Writing > Unit 1 > Practice Assignment.
Length: 1 paragraph[supanova_question]
Preconceptions about Psychology  Top of Form Instructions: Answer ALL of the
Writing Assignment Help Preconceptions about Psychology 
Top of Form
Answer ALL of the following with True or False
Explain any four answers of using at least one credible source for each.
Use full sentences and answer in context (except for true false).
Be specific and cite any sources you use.
(True or False)
1. Focusing on a person’s voice is a better way to detect whether someone is telling a lie than focusing on the person’s face.
2. People tend to underestimate the extent to which other people share most of their opinions, attitudes, and behavior.
3. We tend to see the people in our own groups as more diverse and different from each other than we see people in other groups.
4. People are more likely to be aggressive when it’s hot outside than when it’s cool.
5. Exposure to aggressive models in the media increases aggressive behavior among viewers of the aggression.
6. Parental disapproval for a relationship (e.g., Romeo and Juliet) increases attraction between partners.
7. Overall, people are stupid.
Bottom of Form https://onlyassignmenthelp.com/index.php/2021/11/30/capital-punishmentfollow-the-instructions-below-to-view-the-complete-essay-speech-term-paper-or-research-paper-3/ [supanova_question]
Unit 3: Discussion Instructions The purpose of this discussion board is to
Unit 3: Discussion
The purpose of this discussion board is to provide you with a forum to discuss your newly discovered economic concepts in light of current issues and real-world situations with others in the class. In essence, it is a practice ground for ensuring that your economic reasoning and foundation are secure. This portion of the course requires you to interact with your fellow classmates. Please address these discussion questions below. Make sure to analyze the questions using an “economic perspective.” In other words, utilize economics vocabulary in each of your posts. Respond to at least three classmates’ posts. Remember that content matters. You need to write more than “Great Job” or “I agree with you” to get full credit on your discussion responses.
Discussion Question Part 1: “GDP Data Analysis”
Locate current data for GDP for the U.S.:
Go to the Bureau of Economic Analysis Web site.
Click the rightmost tab, “Interactive Data.”
Click “GDP & Personal Income” under “National Data”
Click the button that says “Begin using the data”
Click on “Section 1 – Domestic Product and Income” to expand the selection.
Select Table 1.1.1. Percent Change from Preceding Period in Real Gross Domestic Product
In the upper right corner of the frame, click on the arrow that says “MODIFY.” Change the SERIES option to ANNUAL and adjust the FIRST YEAR and LAST YEAR options to reflect data from the past ten years. Click “REFRESH TABLE” to generate the data.
What are the annual growth rates for the U.S. economy over the last 5 – 10 years? Has GDP been growing or declining over this time-frame? Explain what factors might have caused GP to increase or decrease over this time-frame.
Next, what are the quarterly growth rates (annualized) for the U.S. economy for the last six quarters? What trends do you notice in these numbers? Does anything surprise you? Comment on GDP growth for the different components of GDP (C, I, G, and Xn) over this time frame?
Website: www.bea.gov (Links to an external site.)
Discussion Question Part 2: “GDP and Economic Well-being”
Then read the following articles and answer these questions:
Is GDP a good measure of economic well-being?
Why, why not?
What are its limitations?
What are some factors that would lead to higher GDP in the U.S. but do not improve well-being?
The Economist: https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2009/09/17/measuring-what-matters?story_id=14447939
The Donella Meadows Archive: https://donellameadows.org/archives/why-should-we-be-glad-when-the-gnp-goes-up/
NPR Morning Edition: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127586501[supanova_question]
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review
Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review
Submit by 2359 (CT) Saturday of Module 2.
Overview: Standards of Nursing Practice and Peer Review
In the Module 2 Reflection Assignment, you will review your own understanding of standards of nursing practice and their applications to nursing. The nurse must comprehend the minimum acceptable level of practice that is expected of them. Then, you will know if a rule or standard is being violated. Then, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.
Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.
Explain the TX BON Rule 217.11 Standards of Nursing Practice
Apply basic knowledge to practice
Differentiate between the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident (217.16 h)
Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.
Part 1 Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11
Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (20 points)
Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (15 points)
Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (10 points)
Response includes 1 sentence (5 points)
Does not answer question
Applying Rule 217.16 Minor vs. Reportable Incident
Correct conclusion with 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)
Correct conclusion with 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)
Correct conclusion with 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)
Incorrect conclusion OR 1 sentence (15 points)
Does not answer question
Applying IBPR Rule 217.19 a (2) Bad Faith
Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)
Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)
Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)
1 sentence (15 points)
Does not answer question
Assignment is written clearly without any grammatical or spelling errors.
Assignment contains 1-3 grammatical or spelling errors.
Assignment contains 4 or greater grammatical or spelling errors.
Part 1: Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11
The Standards of Practice Rule 217.11 can be found here- https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-11.asp
These standards are what the BON expects of you as a practicing nurse. Define TX BON rule 217.11 in your own words. Why is this important? Write 4 professionally written sentences for full credit.
Part 2: Applying Rule 217.16
Let’s review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)-
A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses’ actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.
A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.
Let’s come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee evaluating a fellow nurse’s actions. Think about the word “harp.”
H- no significant Harm
A- nurse must take Accountability
R- easily Remediated
P- no Pattern of this behavior
However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents within a 12-month period.
Look at this case study scenario below.
“Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve. After blood cultures come back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered. He tells Nurse Karen and the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one hour). Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute period. She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50 mg via IV with orders. The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20 minutes. Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history of incidents. She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit manager. Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV medication for the next 60 days. Karen agrees to this plan.”
Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp
Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.
Minor or Reportable?
Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.
Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review
First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.
Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp
to review. Apply the information to this case study-
“Nurse Sam is charting at the nurse’s station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit secretary gathered. Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently). The nurse manager approaches Sam and loudly states, “I am glad you are here. Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior. I know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient Safety Committee. I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month. I thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably fired. I don’t have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt you can with this short notice.”
How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and discuss in the text box.
Rule 219.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.
Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.
N3375 Spring 2020[supanova_question]