Susan Mann’s assessment of the 1950 Marriage Law is ambivalent. While

Susan Mann’s assessment of the 1950 Marriage Law is ambivalent. While acknowledging that the law’s “provision for divorce did have a wide impact,” she criticizes the law’s hidden premise, that “women’s rights under these laws were defined exclusively in the context of marriage and reproduction,” as one that perpetuates old gender stereotypes (Mann, Gender and Sexuality in Modern Chinese History, 77, 76). Is the law’s focus on marriage as a venue to women’s liberation misguided? Or does this focus stem from an astute understanding of the centrality of the family to a woman? In light of the rise of youth autonomy, conjugal power and decline of patriarchal power in Xiajia village portrayed by Yunxiang Yan (Private Life Under Socialism, especially ch. 2, 3, 4), how would you assess the effects of the 1950 Marriage Law? How much of the progress described by Yan can be credited to the Marriage Law?[supanova_question]

A 3 page paper that examines two documents. The first is Essay

A 3 page paper that examines two documents. The first is a letter from a woman whose brother was an American soldier who died in Vietnam. The second is President Kennedy’s response to the woman. There should be a thesis statement establishing an argument in the first paragraph.

Analyze the letter and Kennedy’s response. How does the woman characterize the war? What does she say to Kennedy? How does Kennedy respond? How does he describe and justify the war? Attend to both the political arguments each make, as well as the emotional affect of the letters. (Answering these should only take a page)

Situate the letters in the broader context of the war in Vietnam. DO NOT SIMPLY SUMMARIZE THE DOCUMENTS- develop an argument about them, using the actual letters as well as what you know about the Vietnam War. The argument should be the overwhelming majority of the paper i.e. 2 out of the the three pages.

[supanova_question]

– Fredrick Douglass narative Esssay

History Assignment Help Frederick Douglass lived the first twenty years of his life as an enslaved person in Maryland on both a rural planation and in the city of Baltimore. He experienced first-hand the cruel impact slavery had on the enslaved and even their owners, and after his escape, wanted to share these experiences with Americans living in northern states in the hopes of getting them to commit to the abolition movement. He attacks the institution of slavery on many levels: from its immorality, to its economic limits and even how it undermined the American concepts of liberty and equality. Douglass addressed these issues in the narrative that he wrote in 1845 after his escape from slavery. The purpose of this assignment is to explain why Douglass chose to include the stories he did in his narrative and why he expected them to move his readers to action in the cause against slavery. How do the stories Douglass shares in his narrative tie in to these issues of the immorality and danger that slavery poses to individual Americans (both free and enslaved), and to the country as a whole. Why does Douglass think telling his story to northerners will get their attention and move them to action, when those same stories will do nothing to change the attitudes of southerners? Why tell his readers about his childhood, or his white owners or his learning to read or write? In your essay, you should consider what southerners like John Calhoun or George Fitzhugh are saying about slavery and how that propaganda fit into what Douglass is telling his readers. You will need to choose a few of the more impactful episodes he describes and explain how they fit into Douglass’ abolitionist message, and remember he is not just looking at the impact on African Americans but white Americans as well. Your paper should look into not just moral justifications Douglass uses to oppose slavery, but also for economic and racial issues also. Please note: Your essay should not attempt to answer all of these questions as you would tackle a laundry list, covering each question, one by one. Instead, you should approach them as a prompt to get you thinking about what Douglass was trying to do in his narrative. In short, you should aim to produce a coherent essay that addresses the general theme of the prompt as a whole. In citing sources, you do not have to cite information that is considered general knowledge. Much of the information in lecture and in the textbook is considered general knowledge. You do need to provide citations for things like statistics and, of course, any time you quote from a source, you must cite that direct quote. You are expected to use citations for this assignment, but a simple MLA style is considered sufficient. To properly cite from the Douglass book you would simply need to place a parenthetical note at the end of the sentence where the information appears. Example of a MLA style citation: (Douglass, 16) where the author’s name and the page number the info comes from are included in the parentheses. You may want additional information to support your points and are encouraged to use sources from outside the class (although it is not necessary).

[supanova_question]

Describe the violent uprising of the Whiskey Rebellion including its immediate

Describe the violent uprising of the Whiskey Rebellion including its immediate causes and consequences. Identify the relevant social factors that set the stage for the unrest. Explain how it compares to another uprising of its kind in American History including recent history.[supanova_question]