see instruction

In fact, the presentation answers the topic .  Select one of the levels of the observable Universe, 10n.  Describe an interesting phenomenon observable on the level you have chosen.  Do not repeat (certainly do not copy) examples used in the “Scales of Universe” presentation. You can use any object or measurement that needs scientific notation to be presented.  For example, extreme temperatures, velocities, masses, or lengths will work.Use n (your selected level) as a topic of your post. For example, if you are talking about Venus, whose distance from earth is 1.2·107 miles, give it the topic “n = 7”.  https://htwins.net/scale2/Please do not choose n=-2 n=-3 and n=17[supanova_question]

see instruction

In fact, the presentation answers the topic .  Select one of the levels of the observable Universe, 10n.  Describe an interesting phenomenon observable on the level you have chosen.  Do not repeat (certainly do not copy) examples used in the “Scales of Universe” presentation. You can use any object or measurement that needs scientific notation to be presented.  For example, extreme temperatures, velocities, masses, or lengths will work.Use n (your selected level) as a topic of your post. For example, if you are talking about Venus, whose distance from earth is 1.2·107 miles, give it the topic “n = 7”.  https://htwins.net/scale2/Please do not choose n=-2 n=-3 and n=17[supanova_question]

see instruction

Writing Assignment Help In fact, the presentation answers the topic .  Select one of the levels of the observable Universe, 10n.  Describe an interesting phenomenon observable on the level you have chosen.  Do not repeat (certainly do not copy) examples used in the “Scales of Universe” presentation. You can use any object or measurement that needs scientific notation to be presented.  For example, extreme temperatures, velocities, masses, or lengths will work.Use n (your selected level) as a topic of your post. For example, if you are talking about Venus, whose distance from earth is 1.2·107 miles, give it the topic “n = 7”.  https://htwins.net/scale2/Please do not choose n=-2 n=-3 and n=17 [supanova_question]

N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards

N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects

Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review

Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review

Submit by 2359 (CT) Saturday of Module 2.

Name:

Date:

Overview: Standards of Nursing Practice and Peer Review

In the Module 2 Reflection Assignment, you will review your own understanding of standards of nursing practice and their applications to nursing. The nurse must comprehend the minimum acceptable level of practice that is expected of them. Then, you will know if a rule or standard is being violated. Then, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.

Performance Objectives:

Explain the TX BON Rule 217.11 Standards of Nursing Practice

Apply basic knowledge to practice

Differentiate between the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident (217.16 h)

Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.

Rubric

Task

Accomplished

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Part 1 Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11

20 points

Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (20 points)

Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (15 points)

Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (10 points)

Response includes 1 sentence (5 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Part 2

Applying Rule 217.16 Minor vs. Reportable Incident

35 points

Correct conclusion with 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)

Correct conclusion with 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)

Correct conclusion with 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)

Incorrect conclusion OR 1 sentence (15 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Part 3

Applying IBPR Rule 217.19 a (2) Bad Faith

35 points

Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)

Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)

Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)

1 sentence (15 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Professional Writing

10 points

Assignment is written clearly without any grammatical or spelling errors.

(10 points)

Assignment contains 1-3 grammatical or spelling errors.

(5 points)

Assignment contains 4 or greater grammatical or spelling errors.

(0 points)

Part 1: Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11

The Standards of Practice Rule 217.11 can be found here- https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-11.asp

These standards are what the BON expects of you as a practicing nurse.  Define TX BON rule 217.11 in your own words. Why is this important? Write 4 professionally written sentences for full credit.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.16

Let’s review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)-

A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses’ actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.

A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.

Let’s come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee evaluating a fellow nurse’s actions. Think about the word “harp.”

H- no significant Harm

A- nurse must take Accountability

R- easily Remediated

P- no Pattern of this behavior

However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents within a 12-month period.

Look at this case study scenario below.

“Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve.  After blood cultures come back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered.  He tells Nurse Karen and the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one hour).  Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute period.  She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50 mg via IV with orders.  The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20 minutes.  Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history of incidents.  She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit manager.  Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV medication for the next 60 days.  Karen agrees to this plan.”

Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp

Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Minor or Reportable?

Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review

First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.

Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp

to review. Apply the information to this case study-

“Nurse Sam is charting at the nurse’s station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit secretary gathered.  Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently).  The nurse manager approaches Sam and loudly states, “I am glad you are here.  Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior.  I know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient Safety Committee.  I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month.  I thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably fired.  I don’t have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt you can with this short notice.”

How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and discuss in the text box.

Rule 219.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.

N3375 Spring 2020[supanova_question]

Supporting Content

Students will analyze and discuss what makes a good press kit, book proposal, film treatment, television treatment, or game treatment.INSTRUCTIONS:Initial Post (75%) – DUE WEDNESDAYProject SpecificationsLast week, we learned the importance of drafting an effective query letter. In the letter, we introduced ourselves or our client and gave the agent a brief overview of our creative content. This letter helps the agent determine whether or not he or she can take us on as a client and if a market exists for the sale of our material. If interested, the agent will then request more specific information from us about the content, such as a proposal, treatment, or press kit. This additional material will help the agent finalize a decision and ultimately put together a sales package for potential publishers.Depending on the creative content you’ve chosen, this week you will be putting together either a book proposal, a press kit, a film treatment, a television treatment, or a game treatment (see Project Two for details). In preparation for this assignment, please answer the following question for this week’s post: What makes a good book proposal, press kit, film treatment, television treatment, or game treatment? Please refer to the sample templates provided in the appendix of the textbook, as well as outside resources, on how to create and optimize these materials. Focus on your specific content (for example, if you selected music, talk about what goes into making an effective press kit). In addition to the textbook, if you find helpful resources outside of class, be sure to discuss and cite them appropriately.Response Post (25%) – DUE SUNDAYChoose at least one other student’s post, and reply to it.  Offer three helpful suggestions or information sources, along with appropriate citations. Please keep the tone positive and professional.DELIVERABLES:Complete the reading assignment for the week and then answer the discussion questions given above. Provide an initial post in response to the specified questions, before Wednesday at 11:59pm.Your initial post must be at least three paragraphs in length and cite at least one source (outside of course materials) that discusses events and/or situations with respect to the entertainment industry.  Create a response post to another student’s initial post on this week’s Discussion Board, before Sunday 11:59pm.  Your reply post must be at least one paragraph in length.[supanova_question]

N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards

N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects

Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review

Module 2: Reflection Assignment – Standards of Nursing Practice Peer Review

Submit by 2359 (CT) Saturday of Module 2.

Name:

Date:

Overview: Standards of Nursing Practice and Peer Review

In the Module 2 Reflection Assignment, you will review your own understanding of standards of nursing practice and their applications to nursing. The nurse must comprehend the minimum acceptable level of practice that is expected of them. Then, you will know if a rule or standard is being violated. Then, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.

Performance Objectives:

Explain the TX BON Rule 217.11 Standards of Nursing Practice

Apply basic knowledge to practice

Differentiate between the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident (217.16 h)

Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.

Rubric

Task

Accomplished

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Part 1 Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11

20 points

Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (20 points)

Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (15 points)

Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (10 points)

Response includes 1 sentence (5 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Part 2

Applying Rule 217.16 Minor vs. Reportable Incident

35 points

Correct conclusion with 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)

Correct conclusion with 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)

Correct conclusion with 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)

Incorrect conclusion OR 1 sentence (15 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Part 3

Applying IBPR Rule 217.19 a (2) Bad Faith

35 points

Response includes 4 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (35 points)

Response includes 3 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (30 points)

Response includes 2 professionally written sentences demonstrating critical thinking (25 points)

1 sentence (15 points)

Does not answer question

(0 points)

Professional Writing

10 points

Assignment is written clearly without any grammatical or spelling errors.

(10 points)

Assignment contains 1-3 grammatical or spelling errors.

(5 points)

Assignment contains 4 or greater grammatical or spelling errors.

(0 points)

Part 1: Standards of Nursing Practice Rule 217.11

The Standards of Practice Rule 217.11 can be found here- https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-11.asp

These standards are what the BON expects of you as a practicing nurse.  Define TX BON rule 217.11 in your own words. Why is this important? Write 4 professionally written sentences for full credit.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.16

Let’s review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)-

A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses’ actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.

A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.

Let’s come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee evaluating a fellow nurse’s actions. Think about the word “harp.”

H- no significant Harm

A- nurse must take Accountability

R- easily Remediated

P- no Pattern of this behavior

However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents within a 12-month period.

Look at this case study scenario below.

“Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve.  After blood cultures come back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered.  He tells Nurse Karen and the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one hour).  Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute period.  She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50 mg via IV with orders.  The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20 minutes.  Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history of incidents.  She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit manager.  Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV medication for the next 60 days.  Karen agrees to this plan.”

Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp

Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Minor or Reportable?

Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review

First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.

Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp

to review. Apply the information to this case study-

“Nurse Sam is charting at the nurse’s station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit secretary gathered.  Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently).  The nurse manager approaches Sam and loudly states, “I am glad you are here.  Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior.  I know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient Safety Committee.  I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month.  I thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably fired.  I don’t have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt you can with this short notice.”

How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and discuss in the text box.

Rule 219.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.

Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.

N3375 Spring 2020[supanova_question]

Supporting Content

Students will analyze and discuss what makes a good press kit, book proposal, film treatment, television treatment, or game treatment.INSTRUCTIONS:Initial Post (75%) – DUE WEDNESDAYProject SpecificationsLast week, we learned the importance of drafting an effective query letter. In the letter, we introduced ourselves or our client and gave the agent a brief overview of our creative content. This letter helps the agent determine whether or not he or she can take us on as a client and if a market exists for the sale of our material. If interested, the agent will then request more specific information from us about the content, such as a proposal, treatment, or press kit. This additional material will help the agent finalize a decision and ultimately put together a sales package for potential publishers.Depending on the creative content you’ve chosen, this week you will be putting together either a book proposal, a press kit, a film treatment, a television treatment, or a game treatment (see Project Two for details). In preparation for this assignment, please answer the following question for this week’s post: What makes a good book proposal, press kit, film treatment, television treatment, or game treatment? Please refer to the sample templates provided in the appendix of the textbook, as well as outside resources, on how to create and optimize these materials. Focus on your specific content (for example, if you selected music, talk about what goes into making an effective press kit). In addition to the textbook, if you find helpful resources outside of class, be sure to discuss and cite them appropriately.Response Post (25%) – DUE SUNDAYChoose at least one other student’s post, and reply to it.  Offer three helpful suggestions or information sources, along with appropriate citations. Please keep the tone positive and professional.DELIVERABLES:Complete the reading assignment for the week and then answer the discussion questions given above. Provide an initial post in response to the specified questions, before Wednesday at 11:59pm.Your initial post must be at least three paragraphs in length and cite at least one source (outside of course materials) that discusses events and/or situations with respect to the entertainment industry.  Create a response post to another student’s initial post on this week’s Discussion Board, before Sunday 11:59pm.  Your reply post must be at least one paragraph in length.[supanova_question]