Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model.
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model. Make sure and type the name of the video that you viewed and put the title in double quotation marks. Then, type an overview of the video (see the sample overview on page 603). Then type a film outline that is 5 paragraphs in length (See the sample film outline on page 603). I recommend choosing a video about a subject that interests you and looking at videos from TedTalks.[supanova_question]
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model.
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model. Make sure and type the name of the video that you viewed and put the title in double quotation marks. Then, type an overview of the video (see the sample overview on page 603). Then type a film outline that is 5 paragraphs in length (See the sample film outline on page 603). I recommend choosing a video about a subject that interests you and looking at videos from TedTalks.[supanova_question]
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model.
Writing Assignment Help Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model. Make sure and type the name of the video that you viewed and put the title in double quotation marks. Then, type an overview of the video (see the sample overview on page 603). Then type a film outline that is 5 paragraphs in length (See the sample film outline on page 603). I recommend choosing a video about a subject that interests you and looking at videos from TedTalks. [supanova_question]
Assessable item Description High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Introduction Provide a
Assessable item
Description
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Fail
Introduction
Provide a brief outline of the case study and the content of the paper. Includes topic sentences and includes statement of intent
Displays detailed and succinct introduction that outlines the content and direction of the case study. (5)
Clearly defined introduction that outlines the content of the case study.
(4)
Introduction that outlines general content of the case study. Either topic sentences or statement of intent missing. (3)
Introduction that outlines the content of the case study in a limited manner. Either topic sentences or statement of intent missing. (2.5)
Nil or limited introduction (1)
Critical analysis and synthesis
Demonstrates complete understanding of the case in the context of a comprehensive assessment. Critically examines factors relevant to the case
Demonstrates ability to analyse and synthesise findings in a clear and concise manner. Clinical reasoning applied (13-15)
Demonstrates good ability to analyse findings in a clear and concise manner. Clinical reasoning applied to the case study (11-12)
Demonstrates some ability to analyse and summarise findings. Presents information succinctly while applying clinical reasoning to the case study (10-11)
Displays limited ability to analyse and summarise findings. Presents information with limited clinical reasoning (9-7)
Lack of analysis and poor summary of findings.
(0-6)
Clinical reasoning
Demonstrates clinical reasoning that guided consultation using the RAN model of consultation. Reflects on practice to identify deficits in knowledge and skills and address these gaps roles/scope of practice
Demonstrates at an advanced level clinical reasoning. Reflects on practice and identifies the positives and negatives of the consultation (13-15)
Demonstrates good clinical reasoning skills at an advanced level the use of reflection in analysis of the case study looking at the positives and negatives of the consultation (11-12)
Demonstrates satisfactory clinical reasoning skills in the process of the consultation and reflection on practice. (10-11)
Demonstrates limited clinical reasoning in the process of the consultation and limited reflection on practice. (9-7)
Poor clinical reasoning and reflection with little or no analysis of the case study. (0-6)
Written expression and referencing
Presents material in a logical and coherent sequence.
Acknowledges sources used. Uses literature to inform and support writing.
Communicates ideas clearly and uses appropriate language
Demonstrates mastery of academic English. Correct referencing using APA 7th edition
Within 10% of the recommended word limit (5)
Uses English without errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, or spelling. Correct referencing using APA 7th Edition
Within 10% +/- recommended word limit (4)
Occasional errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, or spelling. Minor referencing errors using APA 7th Within 10% +/-recommended word limit (3)
Significant errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, or spelling. Major errors in referencing using APA 7th Style. Within 10% +/- recommended word limit. (2.5)
Difficult to follow and understand case study. Contains frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Frequent errors in referencing. Exceeds 10% +/- recommended word limit. (1)[supanova_question]
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model.
Submit the video link with your typed analysis of the video using the sample on page 603. as a model. Make sure and type the name of the video that you viewed and put the title in double quotation marks. Then, type an overview of the video (see the sample overview on page 603). Then type a film outline that is 5 paragraphs in length (See the sample film outline on page 603). I recommend choosing a video about a subject that interests you and looking at videos from TedTalks.[supanova_question]