Week 3 Topic: Marketing Strategies to increase sales for a small hair
Week 3
Topic: Marketing Strategies to increase sales for a small hair salon business
Conduct a literature search where the author(s) grounded their study within the “same” theoretical/conceptual framework you propose for your Doctoral Study. Focus only on full-text, scholarly or peer-reviewed articles or doctoral studies/dissertations so that you have six (three quantitative and three qualitative) viable scholarly sources. Be sure to review Section 1.14 of the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook, provided in this week’s Required Readings, for further details of literature reviews and their requirements.
By Day 7
Submit a 4- to 5-page literature review (comprising of six articles minimum; three quantitative and three qualitative) to include critical analysis and synthesis, as appropriate, related to your theoretical/conceptual framework.
Note: This is not an “annotated bibliography” Assignment.[supanova_question]
Submit a draft Qualitative Doctoral Study Prospectus that includes the following: Problem
Submit a draft Qualitative Doctoral Study Prospectus that includes the following:
Problem Statement (not to exceed 150 words)
Purpose Statement (not to exceed 200 words)
Nature of the Study (not to exceed 1 page)
Research Question(s) (20 words max per item) and Interview Questions (may include up to 6 to 10 questions depending on the type of study)
Conceptual Framework (not to exceed 1 page)
References page[supanova_question]
Topic: Marketing Strategies to increase sale for a hair salon business Write
Writing Assignment Help Topic: Marketing Strategies to increase sale for a hair salon business
Write a draft quantitative Study Prospectus that includes the following:
Problem Statement (not to exceed 150 words)
Purpose Statement (not to exceed 200 words)
Nature of the Study (not to exceed 1 page)
Research Question(s) and Hypotheses (20 words max per item)
Theoretical Framework (not to exceed 1 page)
References page
APA 7th edition formation
The problem statement has to in the prospective of a business problem [supanova_question]
Superior Criteria Excellent Criteria Satisfactory Criteria Marginal Criteria Unsatisfactory Criteria Not Submitted
Superior Criteria
Excellent Criteria
Satisfactory Criteria
Marginal Criteria
Unsatisfactory Criteria
Not Submitted
Element 1: Critical Analysis
21 (30%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Several sources and examples support thinking.
19.95 (28.5%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. There are one or two minor errors.
17.85 (25.5%)
Student presents a critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and describing with some details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Some sources and examples support thinking.
15.75 (22.5%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete critical analysis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with vague or missing details identifying the theoretical/conceptual framework of the study, and/or describing with vague or missing details the major finding(s) and strengths and weaknesses of the study. Few sources or examples support thinking.
10.5 (15%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 2: Synthesis
21 (30%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. Several sources and examples support thinking.
19.95 (28.5%)
Student presents a thorough and detailed synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining the relationship of the study to existing literature. There are one or two minor errors.
17.85 (25.5%)
Student presents a synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with some details describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and explaining with some details the relationship of the study to existing literature. Some sources and examples support thinking.
15.75 (22.5%)
Student presents a cursory or incomplete synthesis of each of the six articles (three quantitative and three qualitative) with vague or missing details describing the placement of the research within theoretical/conceptual framework and/or does not explain the relationship of the study to existing literature. Few sources or examples support thinking.
10.5 (15%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 3: Critical Thinking
7 (10%)
Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments.
6.65 (9.5%)
Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. There are one or two minor errors in explanation.
5.95 (8.5%)
Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly.
5.25 (7.5%)
Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the classroom experiences and content; nor analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments are not exhibited.
3.5 (5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 4: Written Delivery Style & Grammar
10.5 (15%)
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.
9.97 (14.25%)
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.
8.93 (12.75%)
Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.
7.88 (11.25%)
Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.
5.25 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Element 5: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)
10.5 (15%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.
9.97 (14.25%)
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.
8.93 (12.75%)
Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.
7.88 (11.25%)
Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.
5.25 (7.5%)
Does not meet minimal standards.
0 (0%)
Did not submit element.
Name: DDBA_8300_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric[supanova_question]
Running head: ENGLISH ENGLISH Instruction Okay, for Option B, some questions you
Running head: ENGLISH
ENGLISH
Instruction
Okay, for Option B, some questions you could try answering that I came up with are: what do John and Mary talk about when they text? Does Mary open up before the investigation ends? Does the investigation complete due to how well they work together? After they are done investigating, what do they talk about? Why is it in secret?
For Option C: why is John just now showing these behaviors? Is there any other behavior he’s doing that’s toxic/manipulative? Why doesn’t Mary experience jealousy and insecurity the same way he does? How does she convince John to get help?
Catie:10:42 For Option D: What kind of treatment specifically is John using? Is it couple’s therapy, or is John in therapy solo? Does Mary need any treatment too? How do they communicate, specifically? What is a specific conversation that they have? Who/what comprises their “beautiful family”?
*Avoid and omit cliches–everywhere. “Love at first sight,” for example, is a cliche, even if you’re using it as your subject matter. So use the phrase sparingly! Here’s a suggested rewrite of your opening sentences:
*Add more! As it is now, the story’s on the short side. Add details and specifics to each option–and/or add an Option E.
A True Love Story
When John met Mary, he fell in love with her instantly–or so he claimed. Does such a thing as “love at first sight” exist? Can being physically attracted to someone confuse a person into believing they’re in love? Here are several options for John and Mary’s love story.
John, a revolutionist, loves his job and does everything to achieve his goals. He is neither married nor in an affair. One day, their company had an urgent investigation into the software malfunction, and the management hired a counter-espionage agent. John is surprised to see a beautiful lady who introduces herself as Mary. She asks him for directions to the manager’s office after producing her identification document as the company’s agent. Mary was attractive, which made John stare at her for a while after directing her to the manager’s office. Mary earned her short steps to the manager’s office and left John stranded and lost in thoughts. Luckily, John and Mary were given the task of investigating the errors clients complained about regarding how the software worked.
As mentioned in A, Mary and John developed some close relationships as partners during the investigation. Although Mary was reluctant at first, they exchanged contact information because they were assigned the same duties. John enjoys working with Mary and texts her regularly after work. On the other hand, Mary also enjoyed John’s company and responded to his messages. Mary’s contract came to an end after a successful investigation, and the company’s management was impressed by the timely completion of the task they got allotted.
Mary and John continued to build a relationship outside of work. They enjoyed getting to know each other intimately and secretly. After years and years of getting to know each other, both of their interests grew stronger, so John decided to propose, to which Mary said yes.
Everything continues as in A. However, after years of marriage, Mary and John started having marital problems. John is very jealous and insecure. His behavior was very odd to Mary because this event was the first time she was experiencing this. Mary contemplated the marriage and whether it was a good decision or not. What she thought was love, at first sight, has now turned into a freaky nightmare. John was constantly spying on her and questioning her whereabouts. She was very uncomfortable and unhappy. Her thoughts of love as puppies and rainbows have now become a dark cloud. However, with her infatuation and the love she has for John, she was determined to fix their marital issues.
After years of treatment, John was able to build confidence and trust in Mary. He realized that the infatuation he had with beauty was the same infatuation that made him doubt her. In the next few years, Mary and John lived happily together. They communicated through many of the issues that came up and built a beautiful family. They thought to themselves that if the scenario in A never happened, they would have never ended up together.
In John and Mary’s case, love at first sight existed, however, that is not the case for every situation. Many people are infatuated by physical appearance at first glance, thinking it is love, which sometimes leads to years of suffering and suffering.[supanova_question]