Long term effects of Marijuana
Is there anything that isn’t pertinent to your paper? Also, try to use a list format for points to make it more concise, and combine sentences to avoid repetitions.NO EVALUATION – The main part of the Annotation nis the EVALUATION of Source Reliability/Validity and Relevance to your Assignment. Here is a checklist to follow:Evaluation of Source ReliabilityUse the Source Evaluation Matrix· Authorship – important credentials (a university), works publishedo Expert in the field?o Many publications on the topic?o What institution does she/he work for?o If not academic, eminent in her/his field?o Any Bias – economic, political, or belief?· Publishero Reputable Publishero Many publications on the topic?o Well-known?· Currencyo Recently publishedo If older, is it still relevant to the debate?· Referenceso Does the source use many sources itself?o A variety of types of sources?o Fully documented?· Writingo Clear explanation of ideas?o Technical language easy to understand?· Reasoningo Sound logic used?o Evidence supports all the claims?o Opposing views included and rebutted?Relevance to your Research Paper· Show how the source is useful to your research. What aspects does it deal with and how it supports your argument.Anything more specific for the Relevance to your study?Try to say more specifically how it will help with your paper –· what aspect of the essay does it refer to?· Does it add a critical view to an issue· Does it support a point of view?· Does it add important data?· etcSecond Source Annotation: The word “chronic use” – is this the correct term?Good introductory sentence, but try to show WHO the source is – credentials”According to the article, the frequent use of marijuana has different implications based on whether such is at the onset of the marijuana use or later stages of long-term usage and dependence.” – is unclear, needs to be rewritten for clarity”The article uses insight from 40 marijuana users and another set of none marijuana users to compare the volume of the white matter in the brain as part of the long-term implications on the individual dependence and abuse of the drug” – Remove the Methodology to make the Summary more concise – unnecessary detail as your paper is not a Methodological analysis.Avoid words like ‘interesting’ or ‘important’ as they are VAGUE and lack meaning. Use more Specific Vocabulary to Clearly State your point.”… shows interesting results. Here, regular cannabis…” – Combine Sentences to be more Concise, to give your Sentences more Purpose and to avoid RepetitionsAgain, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.Third Source:Again, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.”… mental impairment are just but a few implications of long-term marijuana use and dependence, with the study making recommendations for further research on the issue. The scholar also uses the article to make recommendations for future consistency and reporting of results to support a single line of thought on the actual implications of long-term marijuana use.” – Reduce this part to be more concise – are the ‘future research’ and ‘recommendations’ important for your study? If not, cut them or quickly mention them.Thank you so much and please let me know of you have any questions![supanova_question]
Long term effects of Marijuana
Is there anything that isn’t pertinent to your paper? Also, try to use a list format for points to make it more concise, and combine sentences to avoid repetitions.NO EVALUATION – The main part of the Annotation nis the EVALUATION of Source Reliability/Validity and Relevance to your Assignment. Here is a checklist to follow:Evaluation of Source ReliabilityUse the Source Evaluation Matrix· Authorship – important credentials (a university), works publishedo Expert in the field?o Many publications on the topic?o What institution does she/he work for?o If not academic, eminent in her/his field?o Any Bias – economic, political, or belief?· Publishero Reputable Publishero Many publications on the topic?o Well-known?· Currencyo Recently publishedo If older, is it still relevant to the debate?· Referenceso Does the source use many sources itself?o A variety of types of sources?o Fully documented?· Writingo Clear explanation of ideas?o Technical language easy to understand?· Reasoningo Sound logic used?o Evidence supports all the claims?o Opposing views included and rebutted?Relevance to your Research Paper· Show how the source is useful to your research. What aspects does it deal with and how it supports your argument.Anything more specific for the Relevance to your study?Try to say more specifically how it will help with your paper –· what aspect of the essay does it refer to?· Does it add a critical view to an issue· Does it support a point of view?· Does it add important data?· etcSecond Source Annotation: The word “chronic use” – is this the correct term?Good introductory sentence, but try to show WHO the source is – credentials”According to the article, the frequent use of marijuana has different implications based on whether such is at the onset of the marijuana use or later stages of long-term usage and dependence.” – is unclear, needs to be rewritten for clarity”The article uses insight from 40 marijuana users and another set of none marijuana users to compare the volume of the white matter in the brain as part of the long-term implications on the individual dependence and abuse of the drug” – Remove the Methodology to make the Summary more concise – unnecessary detail as your paper is not a Methodological analysis.Avoid words like ‘interesting’ or ‘important’ as they are VAGUE and lack meaning. Use more Specific Vocabulary to Clearly State your point.”… shows interesting results. Here, regular cannabis…” – Combine Sentences to be more Concise, to give your Sentences more Purpose and to avoid RepetitionsAgain, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.Third Source:Again, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.”… mental impairment are just but a few implications of long-term marijuana use and dependence, with the study making recommendations for further research on the issue. The scholar also uses the article to make recommendations for future consistency and reporting of results to support a single line of thought on the actual implications of long-term marijuana use.” – Reduce this part to be more concise – are the ‘future research’ and ‘recommendations’ important for your study? If not, cut them or quickly mention them.Thank you so much and please let me know of you have any questions![supanova_question]
Long term effects of Marijuana
Writing Assignment Help Is there anything that isn’t pertinent to your paper? Also, try to use a list format for points to make it more concise, and combine sentences to avoid repetitions.NO EVALUATION – The main part of the Annotation nis the EVALUATION of Source Reliability/Validity and Relevance to your Assignment. Here is a checklist to follow:Evaluation of Source ReliabilityUse the Source Evaluation Matrix· Authorship – important credentials (a university), works publishedo Expert in the field?o Many publications on the topic?o What institution does she/he work for?o If not academic, eminent in her/his field?o Any Bias – economic, political, or belief?· Publishero Reputable Publishero Many publications on the topic?o Well-known?· Currencyo Recently publishedo If older, is it still relevant to the debate?· Referenceso Does the source use many sources itself?o A variety of types of sources?o Fully documented?· Writingo Clear explanation of ideas?o Technical language easy to understand?· Reasoningo Sound logic used?o Evidence supports all the claims?o Opposing views included and rebutted?Relevance to your Research Paper· Show how the source is useful to your research. What aspects does it deal with and how it supports your argument.Anything more specific for the Relevance to your study?Try to say more specifically how it will help with your paper –· what aspect of the essay does it refer to?· Does it add a critical view to an issue· Does it support a point of view?· Does it add important data?· etcSecond Source Annotation: The word “chronic use” – is this the correct term?Good introductory sentence, but try to show WHO the source is – credentials”According to the article, the frequent use of marijuana has different implications based on whether such is at the onset of the marijuana use or later stages of long-term usage and dependence.” – is unclear, needs to be rewritten for clarity”The article uses insight from 40 marijuana users and another set of none marijuana users to compare the volume of the white matter in the brain as part of the long-term implications on the individual dependence and abuse of the drug” – Remove the Methodology to make the Summary more concise – unnecessary detail as your paper is not a Methodological analysis.Avoid words like ‘interesting’ or ‘important’ as they are VAGUE and lack meaning. Use more Specific Vocabulary to Clearly State your point.”… shows interesting results. Here, regular cannabis…” – Combine Sentences to be more Concise, to give your Sentences more Purpose and to avoid RepetitionsAgain, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.Third Source:Again, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.”… mental impairment are just but a few implications of long-term marijuana use and dependence, with the study making recommendations for further research on the issue. The scholar also uses the article to make recommendations for future consistency and reporting of results to support a single line of thought on the actual implications of long-term marijuana use.” – Reduce this part to be more concise – are the ‘future research’ and ‘recommendations’ important for your study? If not, cut them or quickly mention them.Thank you so much and please let me know of you have any questions! [supanova_question]
Leonardo DaVinci’s Horse
The bibliography and photographs should not be used in the total page count. You will need to utilize at least 5 scholarly sources in your final paper. Your paper should be written in APA or MLA format, and in-text citations should be used. Please double space and use 12pt ft in either Ariel or Times New Roman font.I have selected the topic of Leonardo DaVinci’s Horse for this paper.[supanova_question]
Long term effects of Marijuana
Is there anything that isn’t pertinent to your paper? Also, try to use a list format for points to make it more concise, and combine sentences to avoid repetitions.NO EVALUATION – The main part of the Annotation nis the EVALUATION of Source Reliability/Validity and Relevance to your Assignment. Here is a checklist to follow:Evaluation of Source ReliabilityUse the Source Evaluation Matrix· Authorship – important credentials (a university), works publishedo Expert in the field?o Many publications on the topic?o What institution does she/he work for?o If not academic, eminent in her/his field?o Any Bias – economic, political, or belief?· Publishero Reputable Publishero Many publications on the topic?o Well-known?· Currencyo Recently publishedo If older, is it still relevant to the debate?· Referenceso Does the source use many sources itself?o A variety of types of sources?o Fully documented?· Writingo Clear explanation of ideas?o Technical language easy to understand?· Reasoningo Sound logic used?o Evidence supports all the claims?o Opposing views included and rebutted?Relevance to your Research Paper· Show how the source is useful to your research. What aspects does it deal with and how it supports your argument.Anything more specific for the Relevance to your study?Try to say more specifically how it will help with your paper –· what aspect of the essay does it refer to?· Does it add a critical view to an issue· Does it support a point of view?· Does it add important data?· etcSecond Source Annotation: The word “chronic use” – is this the correct term?Good introductory sentence, but try to show WHO the source is – credentials”According to the article, the frequent use of marijuana has different implications based on whether such is at the onset of the marijuana use or later stages of long-term usage and dependence.” – is unclear, needs to be rewritten for clarity”The article uses insight from 40 marijuana users and another set of none marijuana users to compare the volume of the white matter in the brain as part of the long-term implications on the individual dependence and abuse of the drug” – Remove the Methodology to make the Summary more concise – unnecessary detail as your paper is not a Methodological analysis.Avoid words like ‘interesting’ or ‘important’ as they are VAGUE and lack meaning. Use more Specific Vocabulary to Clearly State your point.”… shows interesting results. Here, regular cannabis…” – Combine Sentences to be more Concise, to give your Sentences more Purpose and to avoid RepetitionsAgain, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.Third Source:Again, too much Summary, with details that are not useful (e.g. Methodology)Add EVALUATION and Relevance – see above for guidance.”… mental impairment are just but a few implications of long-term marijuana use and dependence, with the study making recommendations for further research on the issue. The scholar also uses the article to make recommendations for future consistency and reporting of results to support a single line of thought on the actual implications of long-term marijuana use.” – Reduce this part to be more concise – are the ‘future research’ and ‘recommendations’ important for your study? If not, cut them or quickly mention them.Thank you so much and please let me know of you have any questions![supanova_question]