We first examined some of the similarities. One of the similarities that the Texas Constitution shares with the US Constitution is the belief that political power is derived from the people. Both the Texas Constitution and the US Constitution state that a conscious act of “the people” is involved in creating their state governments (43). We also saw that both constitutions are committed to separation of powers, “the division of governmental power among several institutions that must cooperate in decision making,” (43) meaning that we found that there are three different branches of government, the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary in Texas and the US. We also saw that checks and balances, the “constitutional idea that overlapping power is given to different branches of government to limit the concentration of power in any one branch” (43), is a feature of both constitutions intended to prevent the abuse of power. Finally, we see that both constitutions limit the power of the government by prohibiting it from violating particular rights such as speech and assembly.
We next turned to an analysis of the themes found in the current Texas Constitution. Two in particular, popular control and limiting power, are important to understanding our state constitution. The Texas Constitution expands popular control over government by requiring state officials, such as judges, to stand for election. The more people in state government who are elected should reflect greater control by voters. Another theme, limiting government power, restricts how the government acts and what it can do (57).
The Texas Constitution places a considerable amount of control over the government in the hands of Texas voters. However, because of the low levels of participation of voters the control is minimal at best. The numerous elected officials in the state increases the power of special interests and makes it difficult for Texans to exercise the popular control given to them in their constitution.
Instructor Comments:
The student here does a good job answering the majority of the writing assignment prompt. The chapter conclusion is well organized and written, and the student provides internal documentation from our current text for support. However, the student does not address whether or not the current Texas constitution works for the growing diversity of the state which was the final part of the assignment prompt. This would be an A-/B+ assignment.[supanova_question]
Final Project for english: Adaptation
Final Project about adaptation. This is my English project which is about adaptation. I have also attached all the instructions. my professor mentioned adapting to the topic from our course. The topic is
MURDERS IN THE RUE MORGUE
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2147?msg=welcome_…
this is the link for more information about this topic.
this is the topic that you’ll be going to adapt on. make sure to read the instructions.
I have attached all the instruction that my professor mentioned.
[supanova_question]
Throwing Exceptions Please answer in java programming Please make sure I used
Throwing Exceptions
Please answer in java programming
Please make sure I used Grader than online automatic graded system
The assignment will test your understanding of handling and working with Java Throwables. On the moodle assignment page is the file name Homework.java. This file contains a class that includes several empty functions. Through the process of implementing these functions, you will develop the skills of working with Java Throwables. Please refer to the Homework.java file for the documentation on what needs to be implemented for each of the functions. When you have completed implementing the functions, please upload the Homework.java file to Grader Than.[supanova_question]
Student’s name Professor’s name Institution Course affiliation Date 1. Fracture- A shattered
Writing Assignment Help Student’s name
Professor’s name
Institution
Course affiliation
Date
1. Fracture- A shattered bone is referred to as a fracture. It might be anything from a minor blemish to a full break. Crosswise, lengthwise, in multiple locations, or into many pieces, bone can fracture.
Fract/u’re. (Harvey, 2021)
Wr S
2. Lesion- A lesion is an abnormal tissue region. A lesion can be benign (non-cancerous) or malignant (cancerous) (cancer).
Lesi/o/n. (Zhang, 2021)
Wr. CV S
3. Hypertension- Hypertension is a likely experience in which the blood’s long-term strain against the artery walls is strong enough to produce causes of heart disease.
Hyper/tens/ion. (Almoznino, 2021)
P. wr. S
4. Cellulitis- Cellulitis is an infection that affects the skin’s inner layers.
Cellul/it’s. (Cooper, 2021)
Wr. S
5. Epidermis- The epidermis, or outer layer of the skin, is a nonvascular, nonsensitive layer that covers the true skin, or corium.
Epi/dermis. (Tatsumi, 2021)
P. wr
6. Inflammation: a localized reaction causes redness, warmth, swelling, and pain.
Inflammat/ion. (Mendes, 2021)
wr. S
7. Biopsy: the extraction of cellular components by a pathologist for examination.
Bio/psy. (Forsvall, 2021)
P. wr
8. Malignant: It has uncontrolled growth and can be cancerous, invasive, or metastatic.
Malign/ant. (Kundapur, 2021)
Wr. S
9. Leukemia: only refers to cancer of white blood cells (leukocytes), and this can refer to cancer of any cellular constituent in the blood or bone marrow in practice.
Leuk/e/mia. (Zugmaier, 2021)
Wr. CV. S
10. Angina: An insufficient oxygen supply to the cardiac muscle causes chest pain.
Ang/ina. (Webb, 2021)
Wr. S
11. Orthostatic: characterized by, connected to, or resulting from an upright position.
Ortho/stat/ic. (Juraschek, 2021)
P. wr. S
12. Gynecology: it is the branch of medicine concerned with women’s health and diseases, particularly those affecting the reproductive organs.
Gyneco/logy. (Jones, 2021)
Wr. CV. S
13. Hemophilia: is a bleeding condition whereby the blood doesn’t at all clot properly and is frequently hereditary.
Haemo/philia. (Astermark, 2021)
wr. S
14. Diabetes: is a long-term health problem that impacts how your body converts food into energy.
Diab/etes. (Kanehara, 2021)
Wr. S
15. Surgeon: A surgeon is a physician who performs operations.
Surg/eon. (Manz, 2021)
Wr. S
16. Abrasion: An abrasion is a skin rubbing or peeling that is frequently induced by a cut or a brush burn.
Abras/ion. (Sanou, 2021)
Wr. S
17. Contusion: it is a bruise caused by an impact such as falling.
Con/tus/ion. (Patond, 2019)
P. wr. S
18. Hypotension: It is a condition that occurs when the blood is below the normal pressure range.
Hypo/tens/ion. (Wesselink, 2018)
P. wr. S
19. Pathologist: A physician who studies aberrant cells and tissues to diagnose diseases and disorders.
Path/o/logist. (Zhang, 2019)
Wr. Cv. S
20. Orthopedic: it is the analysis and therapy of the musculoskeletal, especially the vertebrae, joints, and muscles, is the focus of this discipline of medicine.
Ortho/ped/ic. (Amanatullah, 2019)
P. wr. S
References
Almoznino, G., Zini, A., Kedem, R., Protter, N. E., Zur, D., & Abramovitz, I. (2021). Hypertension and Its Associations with Dental Status: Data from the Dental, Oral, Medical Epidemiological (DOME) Nationwide Records-Based Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(2), 176.
Amanatullah, D., Dennis, D., Oltra, E. G., Gomes, L. S. M., Goodman, S. B., Hamlin, B. … & Zullo, S. S. (2019). Hip and knee section, diagnosis, definitions: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(2), S329-S337.
Astermark, J., Holstein, K., Abajas, Y. L., Kearney, S., Croteau, S. E., Liesner, R. … & Shapiro, A. D. (2021). The B?Natural study—the outcome of immune tolerance induction therapy in patients with severe hemophilia B. Haemophilia.
Cooper, H. E., Davidson, E. J., Slack, J., & Ported, K. F. (2021). Treatment and outcome of eight horses with limb cellulitis and septic tendonitis or desmitis. Veterinary Surgery.
Forsvall, A., Jönsson, H., Wagenius, M., Bratt, O., & Linder, A. (2021). Rate and characteristics of infection after transrectal prostate biopsy: a retrospective observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 1-7.
Harvey, N. C., Orwoll, E., Kwok, T., Karlsson, M. K., Rosengren, B. E., Ribom, E., … & McCloskey, E. (2021). Sarcopenia Definitions as Predictors of Fracture Risk Independent of FRAX®, Falls, and BMD in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study: A Meta?Analysis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.
Jones, C., Titus, H., Belongilot, C. G., Soviravong, S., & Stansfield, B. K. (2021). Evaluating definitions for maternal fever as diagnostic criteria for intraamniotic infection in low?risk pregnancies. Birth.
Juraschek, S. P., Hu, J. R., Cluett, J. L., Ishak, A., Mita, C., Lipsitz, L. A., … & Mukamal, K. J. (2021). Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Orthostatic Hypotension: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant–based Meta-analysis. Annals of internal medicine, 174(1), 58-68.
Kanehara, R., Goto, A., Goto, M., Takahashi, T., Iwasaki, M., Noda, M., … & Sawada, N. (2021). Validation study on diabetes definitions using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination data among hospitalized patients. Journal of Epidemiology, JE20210024.
Manz, N., Höfele-Behrendt, C., Bielicki, J., Schmid, H., Matter, M. S., Bielicki, I., … & Gros, S. J. (2021). MIS-C-Implications for the Pediatric Surgeon: An Algorithm for Differential Diagnostic Considerations. Children, 8(8), 712.
Mendes, F. D. C., Paciência, I., Cavaleiro Rufo, J., Farraia, M., Silva, D., Padrão, P., … & Moreira, P. (2021). Higher diversity of vegetable consumption is associated with less airway inflammation and prevalence of asthma in school?aged children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.
Patond, S., Mohite, P., Ninave, S., Wankhade, P., & Pande, V. (2019). Age Related Changes in Accidental Contusion at Tertiary Care Centre. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 13(4).
Sanou, H. Effectiveness of a Multimedia Educational Module for Anesthesia Providers: Integrating Best Practices to Prevent Corneal Abrasion.
Tatsumi, A., Sawabe, M., & Aida, J. (2021). Chronic sun exposure shortens telomeres of the epidermis. Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, 68, 75-83.
Webb, C. M., & Collins, P. (2021). Medical management of anginal symptoms in women with stable angina pectoris: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. International Journal of Cardiology.
Wesselink, E. M., Kappen, T. H., Torn, H. M., Slooter, A. J. C., & Van Klei, W. A. (2018). Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review. British journal of anaesthesia, 121(4), 706-721.
Zhang, B., & Hu, X. (2021). A Medical Image Classification Model Based on Adversarial Lesion Enhancement. Scientific Programming, 2021.
Zhang, Z., Chen, P., McGough, M., Xing, F., Wang, C., Bui, M., … & Yang, L. (2019). Pathologist-level interpretable whole-slide cancer diagnosis with deep learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 236-245.
Zugmaier, G., & Locatelli, F. (2021). Application of Mathematical Logic for Cytogenetic Definition and Risk Stratification of B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL). Medical Research Archives, 9(2). https://onlyassignmenthelp.com/index.php/2021/11/28/what-is-the-difference-between-accounts-and-stigma-provide-a-contemporary-example-of-each-and-explain-why-there-are/ [supanova_question]
11 Final Exam: Ethics of Life, Death and Health Care University of
11
Final Exam: Ethics of Life, Death and Health Care
University of Windsor
General Instructions: Your answers for sections I, II and III should all be placed in a Word document – .docx or .pdf format only. For section II (short essays), answer any 6 questions. Point form is okay. For section I (multiple choice), answer all of the questions. Put your answers in a list in the Word document – do NOT put your answers next to each question. For section III, answer all of the questions at the end of the case study. This exam is out of a possible score of 70. Good luck!
Deadline: No later than Sunday, August 15, 2021, by 11:59 p.m.
I) Multiple Choice Questions [30 marks]
1. In the rich cousin example presented by James Rachels, which of the following is a moral lesson that Rachels wants his readers to draw?
A) Actively drowning the cousin is more humane than letting the cousin drown.
B) There is no distinction between actively killing someone and passively letting them die.
C) It is better to reason with the cousin to share the fortune rather than killing them or letting them die.
D) What matters is the intent of the person who will inherit the fortune, rather than whether the death occurred by act or omission.
E) Two of the above
2. Which of the following models discussed by Seymour regarding the relationship between the mother and the fetus assigns rights to the fetus?
A) single entity model
B) dual entity model
C) invisible link model
D) two of the above
3. Which one of the following is NOT a right of the mother explicitly discussed by Seymour?
A) right to life
B) right to health
C) right to bodily integrity
D) right to self-determination
4. Which one of the following is likely NOT eugenics?
A) genetic engineering of eye color
B) genetic engineering of resistance to disease
C) genetic engineering of ability to reproduce
D) genetic engineering of physical stamina
5. Which one of the following is the clearest example of germline gene enhancement?
A) Altering egg cell DNA to produce a child with 20/20 vision.
B) Shutting off a gene in a sperm cell that will prevent a heritable disease.
C) Shutting off a gene in an egg cell that will result in a child with black hair vs. brown.
D) Removing cells from an embryo and altering DNA to bring immunity above baseline.
6. Which one of the following is the clearest example of somatic gene enhancement?
A) Altering egg cell DNA to produce a child with 20/20 vision.
B) Shutting off a gene in a sperm cell that will prevent a heritable disease.
C) Shutting off a gene in an egg cell that will result in a child with black hair vs. brown.
D) Removing cells from an embryo and altering DNA to bring immunity above baseline.
7. Both Walter Glannon and Dan Brock would agree with which of the following?
A) Gene enhancement should be made accessible to everyone.
B) Gene enhancement is morally acceptable.
C) Gene enhancement of moral virtue arguably cheapens virtue.
D) Gene enhancement of children should be voluntary.
8. According to Hardwig, people that want to live forever are guilty of which one of the following errors in reasoning?
A) false entitlement
B) naturalistic fallacy
C) others don’t matter
D) assuming that life is infinitely valuable
9. According to Dan Brock, which of the following is a positive consequence of allowing voluntary active euthanasia (VAE)?
A) It is more cost-effective than passive euthanasia
B) It helps to foster the well-being of the terminal patient
C) It helps to preserve the moral core of medicine.
D) It helps to foster autonomy.
E) B through D
10. Which one of the following is NOT an example of gene therapy?
A) Altering egg cell DNA to produce a child with green eyes.
B) Shutting off a gene in a sperm cell that will prevent a heritable disease.
C) Removing skin cells and altering DNA to bring provide disease immunity.
D) Shutting off a gene in an egg cell that will result in a child with average height.
11. Daniel Callahan’s views on medical rationing are INCONSISTENT with his views on euthanasia:
A) True
B) False
12. According to Hardwig, which one of the following would most likely NOT have a duty to die?
A) an elderly person with no health insurance with treatable co-morbidities
B) a retired doctor who has lost their memory and their ability to reason
C) an elderly person of means who has co-morbidities that can be mitigated
D) a person who has lived a full and complete life but is now in decline
13. Which one of the following would be an example of non-voluntary passive euthanasia?
A) allowing a competent terminal patient to stop taking in food as a means of letting themselves die
B) removing the feeding tube from an incompetent terminal patient with a living will requesting this
C) giving an incompetent patient with no relatives nor a living will a lethal dose of barbiturates to end their life
D) none of the above
14. Which one of the following would be an example of non-voluntary active euthanasia?
A) giving a comatose patient with no relatives nor a living will a high dose of morphine to ease suffering that may bring about death
B) removing the feeding tube from a permanently comatose patient with no relatives nor a living will
C) giving a terminal patient a lethal dose of barbiturates to end their life against their will
D) none of the above
15. According to John Lachs, which one of the following is a key issue regarding the moral acceptability of voluntary active euthanasia?
A) the right to life
B) the sanctity of human life
C) the right to equal treatment
D) the value of one’s own life
16. Which one of the following is NOT a projection relating to health care and the elderly discussed by Callahan?
A) there will be an increase in life expectancy beyond the age of 65
B) elderly persons will take on increasingly larger portions of medical resources
C) the increase in elderly population will far exceed any increases in the general population
D) there will likely be an increase in chronic diseases due to increases in life expectancy
E) each of the above is a projection relating to health care and the elderly discussed by Callahan
17. The test of moral legitimacy of any medical rationing plan, according to Callahan, involves each of the following as a component EXCEPT
A) respecting the value of the elderly
B) acknowledging contributions made by the elderly
C) treating only those elderly who are morally deserving
D) the elderly should not be devalued nor demeaned
18. Which one of the following is Callahan’s response to the so-called guns and canes argument against medical rationing?
A) The guns and canes argument is based on emotion rather than reason.
B) The guns and canes argument ignores the fact that every government must spend a portion of its budget on defense.
C) The guns and canes argument rests on the assumption that medical funding is dependent on taxation
D) The guns and canes argument diverts attention from the facts and projections relating to health expenses for the elderly.
19. Thomson in her article on abortion does NOT assume which one of the following?
A) Both the fetus and the mother have a right to life.
B) Both the fetus and the mother are persons.
C) The mother has the right to the use of her own body.
D) The right to life involves the right not to be killed.
20. Marquis, in his article on abortion, argues that whereas ________ have a right to a future, __________ have lost that right.
A) human fetuses, animal fetuses
B) healthy fetuses, patients with dementia
C) human infants, human fetuses
D) healthy adults, sick patients
E) none of the above
21. Which one of the following pairs of authors are furthest apart regarding the ethics of abortion?
A) Marquis, Thomson
B) Thomson, Sherwin
C) Marquis, Warren
D) Sherwin, Warren
22. Which of the following is a eugenics method used by both China and Nazi Germany?
A) euthanasia of the infirm
B) birth control
C) use of propaganda
D) two of the above
23. According to Sherwin, a key problem with articles written on abortion is that they unduly emphasize the rights of the _________ while ignoring the rights of the _________.
A) father, mother
B) fetus, mother
C) fetus, father
D) mother, father
E) none of the above
24. Rozovsky and Rozovsky regard informed consent as being a(n):
A) conversation
B) informal agreement
C) process
D) legally binding contract
25. According to Brody, which one of the following models is unable to provide a legal standard that guides physicians in obtaining informed consent?
A) community practice standard
B) reasonable patient standard
C) conversation model
D) transparency model
26. Which one of the following is an argument advanced by Walters and Palmer for research in germline gene therapy?
A) Germline gene therapy is a less expensive technology than somatic gene therapy.
B) Germline gene therapy spares a child the stress of undergoing somatic gene therapy.
C) Germline gene therapy is easier to effect than somatic gene therapy.
D) Germline gene therapy is less likely to lead to eugenics than somatic gene therapy.
27. Which one of the following is a reason why Sherwin maintains that the fetus is a ‘deficient’ person?
A) The fetus is unable to survive without the mother
B) The fetus’ ability to relate to others outside the womb is restricted
C) The fetus lacks the ability to reason and to defend its rights
D) The fetus is not a member of the moral community
28. Which one of the following analogies is used by Thomson to refute the ‘least extreme’ view relating to abortion?
A) burglar analogy
B) coat analogy
C) Fonda analogy
D) violinist analogy
29. In Thomson’s coat analogy where Jones steals the coat from Smith, the coat is analogous to:
A) the fetus
B) the mother
C) the body of the mother
D) the doctor
30. Which of the following does Warren consider to be the least important characteristic of personhood?
A) being able to reason
B) being conscious
C) being able to communicate
D) A and B
B) Short Answer Questions (answer any 6 – point form is okay) [30 marks]
1. Explain the argumentative role played by the violinist analogy in Thomson’s article on abortion.
2. What is a key similarity between Thomson and Sherwin on the abortion debate, and what is a key difference between Thomson and Sherwin on the abortion debate?
3. Explain how Callahan’s view that we should limit health care resources for the elderly amounts to passive euthanasia. Is it voluntary, non-voluntary or involuntary passive euthanasia?
4. What were the three main elements of the Nazi eugenics program? How did the Nazi eugenics program differ from the Chinese eugenics program in terms of motivation?
5. What point was Rachels trying to make with his example of the drowning cousin?
6. What does Hardwig mean by the “individualistic fantasy” and how does this fantasy blind us to the social realities of a possible duty to die?
7. What is the difference between primary care, secondary care, and tertiary care? Provide an example of each.
8. Outline the process leading to consent proposed by Rozovsky and Rozovsky. How would Brody classify their process – legal standards model, conversation model, transparency model? Explain.
9. What would Mahowold say about the decision to allow the infant to die in the following two cases? Explain.
a) Baby Doe case
b) Baby Jane Doe case
10. Explain the difference between somatic cell gene therapy vs. germ line gene therapy. Outline any 3 arguments advanced by Walters and Palmer in support of germ line gene therapy.
11. Why is Dan Brock in favor of gene enhancement? Why is Walter Glannon opposed to it?
12. According to Mary Anne Warren, the traditional pro-life argument equivocates on the term ‘human.’ Explain.
III) Case Study (answer all the questions at the end of the case study) [10 marks]
Case study excerpted from https://practicalbioethics.org/case-studies-good-death-or-assisted-suicide.html
The Case of Mr. Perry and his Pacemaker
Tarris Rosell, PhD, DMin
Rosemary Flanigan Chair at the Center for Practical Bioethics
Mr. Perry (not his real name) was 83 years old and had several medical problems. He had spent the past several months in and out of hospitals and rehab. Prior to that, he lived independently in a small Midwestern town. Widowed many years ago, he subsequently enjoyed the company of a lady friend who lived down the street from the Perry home. He had five adult children and numerous grandchildren.
Life should have been relatively good for this octogenarian. But life was not good. Not anymore. “My body is all worn out. I’m worn out. Don’t want to do this anymore, Doc. They say I can’t go home and be safe. And I’m NOT going to a nursing home. No way! Just stop that little gadget that shocks me and the part that keeps my heart going. I want them stopped. Yes, the pacemaker, too. A magnet will stop it, right? Just do it. Please.”
Mr. Perry had a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implanted a few years ago. It included an electrical pacing component for heart rhythms, on which the patient was 100% dependent. The defibrillator had shocked him, more than once, just before he came to the hospital E.R. with this request. That was the last straw for Mr. Perry. No more shocks for him. No nursing home or rehab or hospitalizations or medications. And no more mechanical pacing either. “I’m tired of fighting.”
Deactivating an internal defibrillator is one thing. The patient’s cardiologist didn’t need an ethics consultation for that decision. “If he doesn’t want to be shocked again, that’s his decision. And if it went off again after he’d requested it stopped, that could be a kind of torture,” she reasoned. Deactivation happened quickly after admission from the Emergency Department. A “Do Not Attempt Resuscitation” order was placed in the chart.
But the pacemaker, also? He wanted it stopped. Ought we do so? Would that be ethically respectful of this patient’s autonomy? Or would it be physician-technician assisted suicide?
“If we stop the pacemaker, Mr. Perry, you will die within a few minutes.”
“Yes, I know. I’m tired of fighting. Please.
A hospital ethics consultation landed on the side of permissibility and respect for a capacitated patient’s autonomy. Subsequently, Mr. Perry had his wishes respected, and he died peacefully surrounded by family and a family friend, who read scripture and offered prayer. A priest chaplain had previously given last rites. His lady friend sat by his side, held his hand, stroked his arm and said, “We’ve had good years together, but you’ve suffered enough. I’ll let you go.” Mr. Perry’s last words were, “Thank you.”
Questions
1. Did Mr. Perry give true informed consent according to the model of informed consent outlined by Rozovsky and Rozovsky or was his judgment clouded by his illness?
2. Is this a case of voluntary active euthanasia or voluntary passive euthanasia?
3. Was having an ethics committee to decide removing the pacemaker necessary? Was the decision base too broad in this case?
4. Would Hardwig argue that Perry had a duty to die? According to Callahan, should Perry have been given the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device in the first place?[supanova_question]
Submission ID: Cohort 4284: Information Management (Resubmission) Final Submission Feedback – Assessed
Submission ID:
Cohort 4284: Information Management (Resubmission)
Final Submission Feedback – Assessed
Assignment Task:
You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the end of Unit 6. Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
Your paper must have a clear structure and must include:
• Cover page (an example is available to you in Induction/Unit 4)
• Abstract (no more than 150 words in a single paragraph)
• Table of contents (Table of tables/figures if necessary)
• A subsection for each of the five questions of the assessment – no more than 4500 words in total
• References (or Bibliography) – at Master level you must use in-text citations to support your arguments and any work cited must appear in the References list at the end of the work
Please ask any questions about the interim assignment and final assessment in the Forum.
Final Assessment – 4,500 words
For all questions below, “an organisation of your choice” ideally means “your organisation”, an organisation you are currently working with/for, or have done so in the recent past. This will allow you to develop a much more critical analysis of internal processes and
characteristics of the organisation. You are specifically asked NOT to discuss Apple, Google, Amazon, Zara, Walmart, etc., unless you work there Questions:
1. Conduct a literature review that critically discusses the concepts of
a. Information Governance
b. Information Security
and their importance in information management. Find and discuss relevant literature (peer-
reviewed literature is preferred, such as journal articles, conference articles, with books, white papers, practitioner literature, and blog articles having a little less weight).
Weight: 20% of the final mark
2. After reading the Procter and Gamble case study (Unit 2), critically discuss the role and responsibilities of senior leadership in information governance in the context of Procter and Gamble
Weight: 15% of the final mark
3. In an organisation of your choice, perform a critical analysis of their use of information systems and information technology (including cloud services and social media) and how this impacts on staff development, effective flows of communication, and decision making in the organisation
Weight: 20% of the final mark
4. Building on your analysis from question #3, critically evaluate possible improvements to the organisation’s use of information systems with emphasis on staff development in line with organisational goals, effective flows of communication, and decision making in the organisation
Weight: 15% of the final mark
5. Critically analyse the importance of security in information management in your organisation in particular
Weight: 15% of the final mark
The remaining 15% of the final mark will be dependent on the quality of Harvard referencing and bibliography, as well as the general presentation of your paper.
==================================================================================Personal Feedback
==================================================================================
Word Count: 4249, OK, a little low excl Abs
Turnitin Similarity Score: 12% – OK, fragments and references
Assessment Feedback Sheet and Marking scheme
Criteria
Max Mark Achievable
Mark Awarded
Comments
Quality of literature review – evidence of independent research, critical engagement with sources, a discussion of the differences between opposing or complementary views; clear understanding of IG and IS?
20%
8
This section was not meant to be focused on P&G but a general review of IG and IS. You cannot undertake a literature review with so few references to support your analysis.
For IG the works of Smallwood, Ross and Weill as well as Hagmann and also Gartner may have been helpful. You should have identified Cobit, and a comparator table of IG frameworks would have been very powerful to use in the analysis.
For IS you should have identified the relevant ISO standard and recognise the human element in security.
Some of the CIO / Consulting surveys would have helped develop a practical view in this area.
Your analysis is very weak and you loose focus.
Demonstration of understanding of information governance in practice; clear argument showing which elements are present in the case study?
15%
6
You explore the P&G case. You are very descriptive of the people and the role. However where is the academic under pinning ?
There needs to be more direct focus on the roles and responsibilities of leadership using multiple references to develop. A table of IG activity, Leadership role, referenced best practice would have been a good way to condense analysis in a small word count.
Solid analysis of the chosen organisation’s/department’s information systems; focus on staff development, communication flow, decision making?
20%
10
For Oracle your analysis is poor, simply offering bullets gives us very little information. Perhaps a table of functional area, application and referenced best practice would be more efficient to develop the analysis.
You need to more fully explore use of cloud and social. There should be more referencing to support your narrative in each sub section.
Critical evaluation of possible improvements to the organisation’s use of information systems; focus on same three key areas as above?
15%
8
You could have used the consulting reports and your analysis from above to build a stronger context for the improvement choice and the prioritisation for your chosen organisation.
Then use further best practice references for the chosen improvements to give further depth. Multiple references can add significantly to your discussion. You ae not developing your analysis sufficiently to gain higher marks.
Critical analysis of the importance of security in information management in the chosen organisation; risk landscape assessment; recommendations?
15%
8
You need to improve the flow / structure as well as the content. Offer further referencing and industry reports for the risks then consider mitigations with supporting references. You can and should be much more specific. A tabulated summary would be very useful. Be consistent with the effort and support to each of the challenges you identify. Narrative on its own is not sufficient.
Referencing and presentation
15%
7
Turnitin, 12%, OK, fragments and references
Word count 4249, OK, a little low
Abstract is too long we only asked for 150 words. It should be positioned before the Table of Contents and not included in it.
Helpful to have a clear structure with a table of contents, but it should align tightly to the question asked.
All tables and figures should have a number, clear description and note the source reference used in their creation.
You are too dependent on web based resources. You must make greater use of the Emerald and EBSCO databases to support your submission or risk continuing to get lower marks. All web links used as references should have a declared Accessed Date. See guidebook here: https://library.aru.ac.uk/referencing/files/Harvard_referencing_201920.pdf
There is not enough referencing to support an academic submission at the post graduate level.
Overall Comments
Total
100%
47
Overall an unsatisfactory assignment. Not achieving the standard expected at the post graduate level. You need to improve your academic research skills as well as critical writing. Do keep a clear focus on the questions.
Mark may be capped if resubmission.
Areas for improvement:
Make full use of Emerald and EBSCO database to support submissions.
Do use multiple references to support key points and recommendations. This will also help your critical analysis. See link: http://masteremergencyarchitecture.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Critical_Reading_and_Writing_for_Postgraduates.pdf
You must demonstrate the ability to offer analysis not simply describe.
Criteria and Weighting
To obtain 70% or above:
To obtain 60% or above:
To obtain 55 – 59%:
To obtain 50% – 54%:
To obtain a Fail grade of between 49 – 40 %:-
To obtain a substantial fail of between 39 – 0%:-
A critical literature review on Information Governance and
Information Security
(20%)
An excellent review, demonstrating independent research (relevant and recent sources, from academic as well as practitioner sources) and critical thinking (engaging with sources rather than taking them at face value; discussing their limitations, strengths and weaknesses)
A good review that demonstrates some independent research and critical engagement with sources.
A good review, showing independent research, although sources are not always trustworthy, are taken at face value, or are outdated.
A reasonably good review, showing little independent research, although sources are not always trustworthy, are taken at face value, or are outdated.
A poor review, showing little or no evidence of independent research and critical thinking.
A very poor review, with little or no sources, and/or little or no critical engagement with said sources.
Critically reflect on the senior manager’s role and responsibility in
leading information
governance in P&G case study (15%)
An excellent reflection, very well written, making full use of the information in the case study as well as relevant literature. Use of theoretical frameworks (such as “five rights”, CIA, etc.) to support the analysis of the roles and responsibilities of senior leadership. Technical issues, cultural issues, security and legal implications of data location, the importance of the “one truth” for decision making are all considered, and more. Coherent and fully justified conclusions.
A good reflection, well written, making good use of the information in the case study as well as relevant literature for the topic, but more integration of theoretical frameworks in practice would be needed.
A good reflection, making some use of existing theoretical frameworks to build and support the argument, which may sometimes lack in clarity. Few issues may be weakly explored.
A reasonably good reflection, making some use of existing theoretical frameworks to build and support the argument, which may sometimes lack in clarity. Some issues may be weakly explored.
A poor written analysis, with limited support from existing theoretical frameworks, and many of the issues are ignored.
A very poor analysis, with little if any link between theory and
practice, or not at all attempted.
Critical appraisal of the use of information systems in an organisation (20%)
An excellent analysis of innerfacing and outer-facing social
media; of corporate infrastructure, including cloud services in use, their type, advantages and disadvantages
for the organisation; operations management; data collection and use for adding added value to the organisation’s operations are all considered to a high level of excellence. The organisation’s particular context is taken into
A good analysis of a chosen organisation, that discusses some of the most obvious aspects of the use of information systems, with good consideration for the organisation’s context
A reasonably good analysis that takes into account a specific organisation and discusses most of the relevant aspects, but misses some of the obvious ones. The organisation’s context may be only partially taken into account in the analysis.
A sufficient analysis that takes into account a specific organisation and discusses some of the relevant aspects, but misses many of the obvious ones. The
organisation’s context may be only partially taken into account in the analysis.
The analysis is limited and does not take into account the context of an organisation or does so only very poorly. Many if not all of the aspects of information systems’ use are ignored.
Little evidence of understanding of the issues surrounding information systems and their use in an organisation.
account in each and every aspect.
Critical evaluation of possible improvements
to the organisation’s
use of information systems (15%)
An excellent proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, in terms of infrastructure, use of the cloud, use of data, use of social media (internally and externally), with a focus on
staff development, communication, decision making. All aspects fully discussed and properly supported by relevant theoretical frameworks and the previous analysis.
A good proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, with few areas that needed more attention and stronger support from the previous analysis or existing literature
A reasonably good proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, with some areas that needed more attention and stronger support from the previous analysis or existing literature.
A rather limited proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, with many areas that needed more attention and stronger support from the previous analysis or existing literature.
A poor proposal for possible improvements to the organisation’s use of IMS, with limited coverage of many of the aspects, and stronger support from the previous analysis or existing literature was needed.
Little evidence of understanding of the issues surrounding information systems and the way they can be used to improve aspects of organisational life.
Critical analysis of the importance of security in information
management in a case study organisation
(15%)
An excellent discussion of the risk landscape around information management in general and in the chosen organisation; types of risks (internal, external, malicious, unintended, natural disasters) and possible impact
(operation, legal, financial) and mitigation. Fully supported by existing literature and great evidence of a logically developed conceptual framework.
A good discussion of the risk landscape around information management, which covers most aspects. Stronger support from existing literature may have been needed.
A reasonably good discussion of the risk landscape around information management, which covers most aspects but misses a few. Stronger integration of theory and practice was needed.
A sufficiently good discussion of the risk landscape around information management, which covers some of the relevant aspects but misses a large part. Much stronger integration of theory and practice was needed.
The analysis is limited and only touches on a few of the aspects, with little evidence of a logically developed conceptual framework.
No real analysis, with no logical development and little or no integration of theory and practice.
Referencing and presentation (15%)
Excellent Harvard referencing throughout the paper and an
excellent bibliography/references list. The paper itself is presented in a clear, logical way, and would be appropriate for peer-review publication.
Very minor Harvard referencing errors throughout the paper and bibliography. The paper itself is presented with some style
Minor Harvard referencing issues throughout the paper and bibliography which does not detract from the academic level of the work. The paper itself is presented clearly and coherently
Harvard Referencing issues throughout the paper and bibliography detract from the academic level of study and/or the spelling and grammar errors cause the whole to be poorly presented.
Very poor Harvard referencing throughout the paper and bibliography and/or a poorly constructed paper.
Either no Harvard referencing and/or spelling and grammar detracts from the academic level required. The paper is not adequate for Master level work.[supanova_question]