Describe the options in the sentencing process. 15 points Criteria Description Describe

Describe the options in the sentencing process.

15 points

Criteria Description

Describe the options in the sentencing process.

5. Excellent

15 points

Description of sentencing process options is clear and makes some connection to research.

4. Good

13.05 points

Description of sentencing process options is missing.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

Description of sentencing process options is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

11.1 points

Description of sentencing process options is present and clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Description of sentencing process options is vague and inconsistent.

Describe how a judge determines an appropriate sentence.

20 points

Criteria Description

Describe how a judge determines an appropriate sentence.

5. Excellent

20 points

Description of how a judge determines an appropriate sentence is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

4. Good

17.4 points

Description of how a judge determines an appropriate sentence is clear and makes some connection to research.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Description of how a judge determines an appropriate sentence is present and clear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Description of how a judge determines an appropriate sentence is vague and inconsistent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Description of how a judge determines an appropriate sentence is missing.

Discuss the different types of punishment offenders receive.

15 points

Criteria Description

Discuss the different types of punishment offenders receive.

5. Excellent

15 points

Discussion of the different types of punishment offenders receive is clear and makes some connection to research.

4. Good

13.05 points

Discussion of the different types of punishment offenders receive is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

Discussion of the different types of punishment offenders receive is present and clear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

11.1 points

Discussion of the different types of punishment offenders receive is vague and inconsistent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Discussion of the different types of punishment offenders receive is missing.

Assess what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial.

20 points

Criteria Description

Assess what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial.

5. Excellent

20 points

Assessment of what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial is clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.

4. Good

17.4 points

Assessment of what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial is clear and makes some connection to research.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Assessment of what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial is present and clear.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

14.8 points

Assessment of what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial is vague and inconsistent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Assessment of what happens if a criminal offender is dissatisfied with the outcome of a trial is missing.

Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

6.09 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

5.53 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.18 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

8 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

4. Good

6.96 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

6.32 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

5.92 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.35 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.7 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

4.35 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.7 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

4. Good

4.35 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.7 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.[supanova_question]

Henry VIII

.All statements relating to the source must be referenced with in-text references. The only reference that can be used is the provided reading material. No outside sources can be used. Please base paper off of this question.What is the central focus of Shakespeare’s Henry VIII?[supanova_question]

Henry VIII

Competencies In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following

Writing Assignment Help Competencies

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies:

Determine how an organization gains a competitive advantage

Determine organizational risk and growth opportunities in order to develop a strategic plan

Defend business decisions in support of an organization’s strategic plan

Scenario

It’s the moment of truth: your opportunity to demonstrate why your new product or service is worth funding. You have done the research and know that the funding you seek can be a game changer for the company. Not only will it produce revenue and profitability, but more importantly, it will strategically set the company apart from its competition.

You just have to convince senior management.

In preparation, you have created a checklist for yourself to use in compiling information that includes research, feasibility of the idea via the BMC, scope of project (timeline included), project risk mitigation, DEI, CSR, and 24-month pro forma.

You know that anything can happen in a funding pitch. With this in mind, you are prepared to answer questions that encompass all aspects of the project.

Directions

Create a pitch for funding. In this pitch, you will have to convince senior management to greenlight the new product or service. Aspects of the pitch that must be addressed:

Value proposition: Describe the company’s current value proposition in the market.

Describe the selected company’s main product or service.

Discuss the company’s overall strategic plan.

Competitive advantage: Describe the competitive advantage the company will gain by funding the project.

Describe how you discovered an opportunity to do something better than your competitors.

Determine how the new product or service shifts the value proposition of the company.

Risks and opportunities: Establish the risks and growth opportunities of the company.

Determine if the new product or service could disrupt the current industry.

Identify the risks associated with the development of this new product or service.

Growth opportunities: Describe the areas of potential growth for the company.

Identify the growth opportunities within the company.

Explain how the competitive advantage allows for growth.

Distinguish as a new product or innovation: Distinguish the new product/service as an innovation or improvement on an existing product/service.

Determine if the product or service fits within the capabilities of the company.
Note: a company’s SWOT analysis or 10-K is an indicator of whether the new product or service could be feasible.

Explain how the new product or service adds to the portfolio of the company.

Target segment: Describe the targeted segment.

Identify the target customer.

Explain your blue ocean strategy.
Note: The new market is identified here.

Speculate sales: Speculate on the projected sales.

Justify your product or service by the numbers; discuss your projected revenue gain.
Note: it MUST have an ROI that justifies the project for investors and/or senior management.

Explain the risks associated with projected sales.

Speculate profitability: Speculate on the profitability of your proposed product or service.

Determine if the project is profitable.
Note: In this pitch for funding, senior management has to know that the project, based on market research, is speculated to be profitable. Use the company’s current income statement to project how the company’s profitability will be affected. Look to other companies in the marketplace with products or services similar to the one you are proposing as a basis for your projections. Note: these numbers are purely speculative.

Determine the impact on the functional areas of the business (accounting, marketing, sales, and so on).

CSR plan: Outline the plan to service the community or customers that purchase the product or service.

Discuss how the idea demonstrates corporate social responsibility (CSR).

Identify what the company has invested in as it relates to the communities they serve.

Discuss how a good CSR plan helps the company gain competitive advantage.

DEI plan: Summarize how the project will include a variety of perspectives to get a better unique value proposition.

Determine if the company has a corporate culture built on DEI.

Discuss how the project’s DEI plan fits into the company’s overall strategic plan.

What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit one of the following:

Funding pitch video or audio recording

Film a 15-minute camera facing or audio only recording. It must be submitted as one of the following file types: SWF, MPG, MPEG, RM, MP3, MP4, M4V, M4A, AVI, WAV, RAM, ASF, MOV, RA. You must also submit a speech outline in a Word document with the topics listed in order and a References page. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Funding pitch script

Your script should be written as if you were delivering the speech, submitted as a 7- to 8-page Word document. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

Project Rubric

Criteria

Exemplary (100%)

Proficient (85%)

Needs Improvement (55%)

Not Evident (0%)

Value

Value Proposition: Main Product or Service