While you could write in the first person, your writing and presentation should still be at university level. Marks were lost because of:
Incorrect spelling, (centimetres – not centimeters! metres – not meters!)
Poor grammar and poor sentence structure – quite a few of you either did not edit your assignment or you need support with developing literacy skills. I suggest that if you have problems with literacy that you address this before commencing the MTeach as you will struggle to pass the mandatory literacy requirements to be a primary school teacher
Contractions of words such as ‘do not’ – ‘don’t’ and ‘would not’ – ‘wouldn’t’, are not suitable for use in academic writing
There is no such thing as dices or indeed dice’s!
The use of apostrophes needs to be carefully revisited by a large number of you.
Criterion 2: Explanations show understanding
First and foremost the assignment was a mathematics assignment and as such there should be an emphasis on the mathematical explanations and calculations.
Careful reading of the question and rubric is essential as is answering all the questions and including all parts of the assignment.
In some cases there was limited analysis of the data which was gathered
While some of you analysed the data you did not back up what you were saying with the mathematical processes and calculations, which meant that we could not check if what you were saying about the numbers was correct or that you actually understood the mathematics behind it.
Criterion 3: Mathematical calculations show understanding
Any/all explanations or statements made must be supported with the calculations and mathematical processes AND/OR vice versa.
No photos of tables or calculations are permitted, the only photo is the Yowie worksheet.
Many of you would have benefited from rewriting the calculations or redoing the drawings in the assignment as you may have identified the errors before submitting the assignment
Some calculations were easy to see, but some were ineffective in demonstrating your understanding of the mathematics as many of you omitted an explanation of the process.
Criterion 4 and 5: Mathematical language and extension to the activity
There were a large number of you who identified a number of possible extensions, but did not conduct the investigation that would have completed one of them. Completing an extension was clearly stated in tutorials many times and it was also in the learning guide.
If the extension was omitted – no marks were awarded
If the extension ideas were included but were not completed – only some marks were awarded
For the most part, the mathematical language and content was included and explained[supanova_question]
Assessment Description Prof Wager week 7 DQ Question 1 Propose strategies for
Assessment Description
Prof Wager week 7 DQ
Question 1
Propose strategies for disseminating your evidence-based practice project proposal. Consider the necessary stakeholders who need to review or approve the proposal (both internal and external) and what methods you will use to communicate.
Question 2
After implementation, dissemination of the evidence-based practice outcomes is essential for evaluating the success of the project for ensuring sustainability. Propose strategies that you could use for disseminating the outcomes of your evidence-based practice project proposal. Consider what information would need to be communicated, which stakeholders would need to be involved, and the communication methods needed.
Please this assignment requires 250 words each with APA 7th edition. Also, please use nursing journals, books, etc., for references.
Due date 08/28[supanova_question]
Assessment Description Leadership studies demonstrate that the most effective leaders know how
Assessment Description
Leadership studies demonstrate that the most effective leaders know how to draw upon self-leadership skills to in turn motivate and lead others to expand their strengths to ultimately better serve the goals of an organization. For this assignment, you will continue to study conscious leadership and look at a leadership example from contemporary media and evaluate how well the particular leader exemplifies the qualities of effective and ethical conscious leadership.
Select a relevant and topical leadership issue from current news media that revolves around ethics and ethical decision-making. Research the situation and gather information in order to evaluate the leader. Keep in mind, the issue that you choose will serve as the backdrop for your evaluation while using the key terms and concepts covered in your course readings. Write an evaluation of a minimum of 1,000-1,250 words of the situation that addresses the following:
The power bases used by the leader.
The influence tactics used by the leader.
The leadership style of the leader.
The outcome (or potential outcome) of the situation.
Conclude by justifying whether you think this leader supports the values of conscious capitalism. Is the leader’s leadership style effective? Do you believe the leader acted ethically in the situation? Be sure to consider each tenet of conscious capitalism in your leader evaluation.
Next, imagine yourself as a practitioner of servant leadership. You have been appointed into the leadership role in this same circumstance. Explain how the situation would be different. Address the four criteria listed above in your discussion and incorporate the principles of conscious capitalism by explaining how your personal values and style are influenced by each tenet.
Strengthen your claims in each content section of your essay with supporting citations and specific examples.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.[supanova_question]
Assignment Detail Task Description: You are required to create a 15-minute presentation
Writing Assignment Help Assignment Detail
Task Description:
You are required to create a 15-minute presentation on the new casino development that is part of the Queen’s Wharf integrated resort development (IRD) in Queensland.
In this presentation, you need to appraise this new casino development on behalf of a client, indicating whether your client supports – or does NOT support – the new casino development.
Prospective Clients
Client suggestions include the following (though you are welcome to select a different client):
Clubs Queensland (https://www.clubsqld.com.au/)
Queensland Hotels Association (https://qha.org.au)
The Alliance for Gambling Reform (http://www.pokiesplayyou.org.au/)
Star Entertainment Group (https://development.star.com.au/)
Brisbane Tourism (https://www.visitbrisbane.com.au/)
Restaurant & Catering Queensland (http://rca.asn.au/rca/queenslandnorthern-territory/)
Gabba Ward Council (https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/about-council/governance-and-strategy/lord-mayor-and-councillors/ward-office-locations)
NOTE: You need to select one (1) client only.
Alignment with the Chosen Client
In your presentation, the position you advocate on behalf of your client will either be one of support – or non-support – for the new casino development being part of Queen’s Wharf IRD.
This position must align with your client’s mission, objectives, purpose and values with regard to the new casino development.
Therefore, you should undertake research using secondary sources of information to determine the most likely position your client would adopt (ie, supporter or non-supporter of the development).
The Audience
Your presentation must persuade and advocate for the position your client will take regarding the new casino development. In doing so, you are trying to convince the audience that your client’s position is the best one for everyone to follow.
The audience will be made up of various stakeholders, some of whom will be supporters of the new development, and others who will be non-supporters.
Also in the audience will be representatives for all the other clients (from the ‘Prospective Clients’ list above).
Therefore, it is important you understand the position of these other stakeholders and clients (are they likely to be supporters or non-supporters?) so that you can defend your own client’s position, and persuade the audience that your client’s position is the best one to follow regarding the new casino development being part of Queen’s Wharf IRD.
PRESENTATION AND SUBMISSION FORMAT
This assignment does not require a face-to-face presentation. Instead, you will create a 15-minute (maximum) PowerPoint slide show with narration (as you would present this to a ‘live’ audience). If you are not familiar with recording a slide show with narration, click HERE to find the instructions.
You will need to submit one MS PowerPoint file. Please avoid making the file in a movie/video format as it tends to create a file submission issue later.
Given that people speak 100-150 words per minute, aim for an overall script within the range of 1,500-2,250 words.
GENERAL TIPS FOR PRESENTATION
List your references (sources of information) on the final PPT slide (however, do not ‘speak’ to this slide as part of your oral presentation – just show it)
Make your presentation as informative and appealing as possible
Deliver the message that is critical but commonly overlooked
Use key points, words, phrases, diagrams, etc to engage your audience
Do not type sentences on PowerPoint – written material must be succinct
Include a few high-quality graphics (eg, tables, diagrams, photographs, etc) – these make your slides more interesting and easier to follow than text alone
Avoid including movie/video clips in your file or making your file in a movie/video format. The inclusion of movie clips or a video format will enlarge your file size and will make it difficult to submit the file to Blackboard. Please ensure that you receive and keep the submission confirmation email upon your submission. [supanova_question]
Integrative Theory and Practice ICP040L005Y The Client Study 3,000 words Deadline: 23rd
Integrative Theory and Practice ICP040L005Y
The Client Study
3,000 words
Deadline: 23rd of April 2021
Part of the assessment of this module requires you to write a client study of 3000 words.
This gives you the opportunity of demonstrating practical competence, understanding of relevant theory in relation to the client and the work, understanding of relevant theory in relation to the client and the work, awareness of therapeutic process and of the influence of contextual factors on the therapeutic encounter.
The expectation is you will draw on person-centred, psychoanalytic and cognitive behavioural frameworks. Evidence of all three will be expected in the reflections.
CLIENT STUDY FORMAT AND GUIDELINES YEAR 2
Demographic information
Date of 1st session:
Date of last session or ongoing: No. of sessions:
Client Pseudonym:
Age: Gender:
Ethnicity: Religion:
Sexual Orientation: Disability:
Context
Organisation:
Where the client is seen: type of organisation (voluntary, statutory, private), Trainee’s contract (voluntary, paid)
Counselling Setting: (brief description)
Referral: Referred by: Date of referral: Reason for referral:
Other current professional help:
1. ASSESSMENT
Presenting Issue(s)
Describe the client’s initial presentation of problems and the history of the presenting problem (first occurrences, origins, precipitating and maintaining factors, previous professional help, etc.)
First impressions
Describe the client’s appearance, behaviour and way of relating including counsellor’s responses to this.
History and current context
Provide any relevant personal history and background
Identify significant current and past relationships and any other relevant social factors.
Theoretical perspective
Briefly describe your usual theoretical orientation and therapeutic approach. Important to use Person-centred and psychodynamic theories and where possible CBT if appropriate.
Formulation
Explain how you understand the client and his/her predicament.
Link this understanding to relevant theory and research
Given this understanding, explain theoretically how the therapeutic approach you intend to take might be likely to be of benefit to the client
2. THE NATURE OF THE CONTRACT
Comment on the implications of any differences between you and the client and how you have worked with these
Structure: Indicate frequency and duration of sessions
Provide any other information relevant to boundaries
3. THERAPEUTIC PROCESS AND RELATIONSHIP
Therapeutic Process: Summarise the main themes, concerns and issues worked on
Explain how you understood what was happening in the process with reference to relevant theory.
Boundaries: Comment on the client’s and your adherence or not to boundaries, how you understood this and how you worked with it, if relevant.
Therapeutic Relationship: Describe the relationship between you and the client, including how you experienced her/him and link this to relevant theory.
Give examples of how you used your understanding of the therapeutic relationship to work with the client.
Describe any difficulties in the relationship and how you worked with them.
4. OUTCOME
Describe how the work with the client developed and what changes took place.
Identify any obstacles to progress and how you worked with them.
5. CRITICAL REFLECTION
Provide a critical assessment of your work with this client
and identify what you have learned from.
N.B. Theoretical concepts, approaches and research referred to in the Client Study must be appropriately referenced.
Marking Guidelines for Assessment of Client Work (M level)
Mark Range Criteria
90-100 Meeting all criteria mentioned under 70-79 to the highest standards, demonstrating an outstanding level of competence and distinctive creativity.
Meeting all criteria mentioned under 70-79 to the highest
Standards – with evidence of distinctive creativity.
Evidence of ability to write clearly, concisely and with critical
originality about client work.
Demonstration of an ability to work creatively using a
consistent relational approach which is applied flexibly and
appropriately to a range of clients and presenting problems.
Evidence of a highly-developed ability to link theory and
Practice. Demonstration of ability to reflect in depth on own issues
and the therapeutic process and relationship and to work
with these independently and consistently within sessions.
Evidence of ability to write clearly and concisely about client work.
Demonstration of a good understanding of problem formulation, intervention and outcome evaluation using relational concepts consistently and appropriately. (There are no significant gaps in the student’s knowledge, but she/he has not developed her/his knowledge much beyond what is required for this level of work.)
Demonstration of an ability to produce consistently sound work with some variety of clients and presenting problems.
Evidence of ability to link theory with practice and make appropriate critical comments.
Demonstration of ability to reflect on self and the therapeutic process and relationship with critical awareness and to work with these independently at times within sessions.
Evidence of ability to write coherently and accurately about client
work. Demonstration of a satisfactory understanding of problem formulation, intervention and outcome evaluation within a consistent relational approach (There may be some gaps in the student’s knowledge but there is no evidence of these impacting negatively on client work.) Demonstration of sound, but sometimes inconsistent, work within the approach employed, or more consistent work but with a narrow range of clients or presenting problems.
Evidence of ability to link theory and practice. Demonstration of ability to reflect on self with critical awareness.
An awareness of, and ability to reflect on therapeutic process and relationship and to work with these at times independently in sessions, but at times needing prompting and guidance from supervisor.
FAIL……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
(the presence of any one of these is sufficient to result in
failure)
Insufficient evidence of awareness of ethical issues and/or insufficient evidence of ability to manage them within a therapeutic framework. Evidence of ability to write about client work, but with lack of coherence or accuracy.
Demonstration of a limited understanding of any of the following: problem formulation, intervention or outcome evaluation using some relational understanding (There will be gaps in the student’s knowledge sufficient to impact negatively on client work)
Demonstration of some satisfactory practice using a relational framework, but with insufficient consistency and with a narrow range of clients and presenting problems.
Insufficient evidence of ability to link theory and practice either in writing or when questioned at viva.
Demonstration of limited ability to reflect on self even with prompting (either in supervision or viva).
An awareness of, and some ability to reflect on, the therapeutic process and relationship but little evidence of ability to work with these within sessions.
39 and below (the presence of any of these may result in the student being
advised to withdraw from the programme)
Evidence for lack of awareness of ethical issues
Evidence that written material about client work is both incoherent and inaccurate.
Demonstration of an inadequate understanding of any of the following: problem formulation, intervention or outcome evaluation (There will be gaps in the student’s understanding sufficient to question the student’s competence to practice.)
Inability to demonstrate consistent practice to a satisfactory level in a recognisable relational approach.
Insufficient knowledge of theory and inability to link this to practice even with guidance.
Demonstration of limited ability to reflect on self even with prompting (either in supervision or viva).
Insufficient awareness of therapeutic process and relationship and no evidence of ability to work with these within sessions.
Evidence for lack of competence/professionalism/self-reflectiveness which may be harmful to clients.
_______________________________________________________[supanova_question]
With the poem below I need for it to be revised.
With the poem below I need for it to be revised. Re-write this poems from the view of a wife who is being verbally and physically abused by her husband. Make the the person reading the poem feel the pain of this wife. Don’t be afraid to go into great detail.[supanova_question]