College of Administrative and Financial Sciences Assignment 3 Deadline: 4/12/2021 @ 23:59

College of Administrative and Financial Sciences

Assignment 3

Deadline: 4/12/2021 @ 23:59

Course Name: Communications Management

Student’s Name:

Course Code: MGT-421

Student’s ID Number:

Semester: 1st Semester


Academic Year: 2021-2022

For Instructor’s Use only

Instructor’s Name: Dr. Arfia Aman

Students’ Grade: Marks Obtained/Out of

Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low


The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.

Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.

Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.

Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.

Late submission will NOT be accepted.

Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.

All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).

This assignment is an individual assignment.

Citing of references is also necessary in APA style.

Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.

Assignment Structure:




Critical Thinking (Case Study)


Writing Exercise




Learning Outcomes:

Perform all communication abilities, including thinking, writing, speaking, listening, and assessing the technology.

Communicate better, knowing that good communicators make better managers and that communication is a dynamic process basic to individuals and organizational life.

Ability to write effective business letters, memorandums, and case studies.

Critical Thinking (Case study)

Volkswagen had a major push to sell diesel cars in the US, backed by a huge marketing campaign trumpeting its cars’ low emissions, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) discovered in 2014 that Volkswagen had deliberately installed cheating software in more than 500,000 diesel passenger cars sold in the United States. The software allowed the cars’ computers to sense when the vehicles were being tested for harmful emissions and to switch, undetected, to a driving mode that artificially reduced nitrogen oxide or NOx (linked to smog and lung cancer) so the cars could pass the test. Once back on the road, the computers adjusted the driving mode again, permitting drivers to experience the power and mileage the company was touting while allowing some cars to emit as much as 40 times the volume of pollutants permitted by law. Volkswagen had done the same in more than 10 million other cars sold around the world. The U.S. government’s case against VW resulted in a settlement of almost $15 billion and included massive repair and buy-back programs. Another $4.3 billion in civil and criminal penalties was levied against the company, some of which is to fund projects to reduce NOx in the air; eight high-ranking executives were charged with crimes, and two received prison sentences. The company lost more than a quarter of its market value as its stock price plummeted. How did a venerable and successful company come to commit what one business publication called “a truly brazen act of business malfeasance” in the first place? More stringent controls on NOx took effect in 1999, and of the two possible ways it could meet them, VW chose the one that did not require a costly reengineering of the interior of its cars. This might have seemed like the right business decision to make, but as a side effect, VW’s new NOx controls dramatically reduced the degree of fuel economy the company was advertising. It was apparently at this point that the decision to rig the cars to falsify emissions tests was made. Volkswagen’s financial performance has returned to pre-scandal levels even as the possibility remains that more huge fines will be levied, this time by European investigators. In early 2018, another scandal broke when the company was forced to apologize for exposing monkeys to engine fumes to research the effects of diesel exhaust. “We’re convinced the scientific methods chosen then were wrong,” said a company statement. “It would have been better to do without such a study in the first place.”

After reading the case study answer the following questions:

What are the fundamental ethical dilemmas faced by Volkswagen’s managers and how communication was part of it? (1 Mark)

Some of Volkswagen’s managers had to resign and, one manager spent time in jail due to their decisions. How could they avoid making this unethical decision? (1 Mark)

Writing Exercise

Assume that you have not heard anything from a company since submitting your application letter and resume. Write a follow-up letter inquiring about the status of your application.

(2 Marks)

Assume after you send the follow-up letter, you are lucky enough to be called for an interview. Think about some questions that you would find difficult to answer. For each, write out an answer that is concise, well-reasoned, and well-supported.( 1 Mark)



Reference for the case study.

Kinicki, A., & Soignet, B. D. (2021). Management: A Practical Introduction (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.