Capital PunishmentFollow the instructions below to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper:

Is there a rational resolution to the capital punishment debate? Arguments on both sides create a hierarchy of various goals and principals in an effort to offer resolution.
The principle of “common human dignity” appears to play a central role in determining the appropriateness of the death penalty as punishment. But because “common human dignity” cannot be precisely defined, other considerations – such as whether capital punishment is acceptable to society, whether the death penalty is administered in an even-handed way, and whether the purported goals can be met – are used as gauges.
In Furman v. Georgia (1972), for example, the Supreme Court used the “common human dignity” principle as the basis for a test of a Georgia statute regarding capital punishment. In this case, the Supreme Court not only determined that the statute unfairly administered the death penalty, it also deemed capital punishment impermissible.
The Supreme Court roughly measured “common human dignity” in terms of the pain that a punishment would exact, and a vague maxim that “huma…[supanova_question]