Any topic (writer’s choice)
Each of these papers will count as one hour of participation in a study. Thus, if you would like to complete your entire requirement by writing papers, you will need to submit four two-page papers in total. 2) Each paper must consist of two, double-spaced text pages (at least 600 words) and be on a topic related to some area of Psychology discussed in your particular Introductory course (in other words, not on a topic in an area of Psychology irrelevant to your class). If you choose to write more than one paper to complete the requirement, each must be on a different topic. 3) Each paper should discuss some finding, idea, or application of a relevant topic that goes beyond what was discussed in your readings and lecture. For example, you may write about a new finding discussed in the media that is relevant to a topic discussed in your class but was not directly mentioned either in lecture, discussion, or your readings. 4) It is important that you choose a reputable source for your paper topic – for example some professional magazine, newspaper, or online source – and not simply a discussion board or amateur blog. You are to list your source(s) at the bottom of your paper so that it can be verified. Your paper should be written completely in your own words and you are not to plagiarize in any way. If you have any questions about plagiarism, please refer to: http://www.plagiarism.org/[supanova_question]
Any topic (writer’s choice)
Each of these papers will count as one hour of participation in a study. Thus, if you would like to complete your entire requirement by writing papers, you will need to submit four two-page papers in total. 2) Each paper must consist of two, double-spaced text pages (at least 600 words) and be on a topic related to some area of Psychology discussed in your particular Introductory course (in other words, not on a topic in an area of Psychology irrelevant to your class). If you choose to write more than one paper to complete the requirement, each must be on a different topic. 3) Each paper should discuss some finding, idea, or application of a relevant topic that goes beyond what was discussed in your readings and lecture. For example, you may write about a new finding discussed in the media that is relevant to a topic discussed in your class but was not directly mentioned either in lecture, discussion, or your readings. 4) It is important that you choose a reputable source for your paper topic – for example some professional magazine, newspaper, or online source – and not simply a discussion board or amateur blog. You are to list your source(s) at the bottom of your paper so that it can be verified. Your paper should be written completely in your own words and you are not to plagiarize in any way. If you have any questions about plagiarism, please refer to: http://www.plagiarism.org/[supanova_question]
Any topic (writer’s choice)
Writing Assignment Help Each of these papers will count as one hour of participation in a study. Thus, if you would like to complete your entire requirement by writing papers, you will need to submit four two-page papers in total. 2) Each paper must consist of two, double-spaced text pages (at least 600 words) and be on a topic related to some area of Psychology discussed in your particular Introductory course (in other words, not on a topic in an area of Psychology irrelevant to your class). If you choose to write more than one paper to complete the requirement, each must be on a different topic. 3) Each paper should discuss some finding, idea, or application of a relevant topic that goes beyond what was discussed in your readings and lecture. For example, you may write about a new finding discussed in the media that is relevant to a topic discussed in your class but was not directly mentioned either in lecture, discussion, or your readings. 4) It is important that you choose a reputable source for your paper topic – for example some professional magazine, newspaper, or online source – and not simply a discussion board or amateur blog. You are to list your source(s) at the bottom of your paper so that it can be verified. Your paper should be written completely in your own words and you are not to plagiarize in any way. If you have any questions about plagiarism, please refer to: http://www.plagiarism.org/ [supanova_question]
Education Inequality
Abstracts are not required for the Draft Proposal]IntroductionII. Literature ReviewIII. MethodA.ParticipantsB.InstrumentationC.ProceduresIV. AnalysisV.DiscussionVI References CitedVII AppendicesIntroduction[This is the first 1-2 paragraphs and should establish why the topic is interesting and important. Define key terms.II. Literature Review[What are the most important sources on this topic?What are the main past findings, debates or theories on this topic and how do they relate to the research being proposed?Purpose of the proposed study–Hypothesis or guiding research questions.]III. Method Participants[Who or what (such as in content analysis) is going to be studied?How are they going to be selected?How many?] Instrumentation[How will the variables be measured?] Procedures[How will the data collection be carried out?Are there any ethical issues, and if so how are they to be addressed?]IV. Analysis[What kind of data analysis will be done? For example will there be tables and graphs? Will it be a qualitative analysis looking for patterns and themes? ]V. Discussion[Limitations of this proposed research][Implications of the potential results ] VI References CitedVII Appendices[supanova_question]
5 Final Project Milestone One: Problems and Issues Yuri Suazo Southern NewHampshire
5
Final Project Milestone One: Problems and Issues
Yuri Suazo
Southern NewHampshire University
August 22nd, 2021
Introduction
Fortuga Artisans, Inc. provides a leadership style case study showing that leaders need to develop strong relationships with their followers. Peter Fortuga, based in Charleston in South Carolina, founded the company in 1981 and grew to include global operations. The business is still headquartered in Charleston and has 47 full and part-time employees. In 2011 Peter Fortuga announced his withdrawal. Doug Jeffers was chosen by Peter Fortuga and the Board of Directors as the company’s new CEO. He was a good recommendation as the board had worked with him and understood his leadership position. Jeffers was known for his innovative ideas and charity, distinctive, ambitious, and driven attitude, which was crucial to his appointment. However, leadership and communication were lacking, and the company suffered in the aftermath. Doug Jeffers and Peter Fortuga were very different in style, attitude, and approach, which provided a very different outcome. Some leaders have a more democratic leadership style, which involves asking for as many opinions as they can in the decision-making process. They believe in the meritocracy approach and strategic approach. On the other hand, others use an automated top-down strategy where it is their way and do not want feedback from subordinates.
Problems and Issues
Issues and problems at Fortuga developed with time, and Jeffers’ managing assistant left within the first two years of his leadership. The assistant cited that she was not confident about how Jeffers was leading the company. The resignation shocked Jeffers as he struggled to understand the impact of his leadership on employee turnover. Leadership is based on the ability to develop positive relationships with other people. In this case, strong teams are built on the foundation of strong relationships. The strong relationships between the leader and the followers ensure that the virtues of togetherness, loyalty, dedication, and drive to reach a further milestone are stronger. As time passes, the strength of the relationship will impact the company’s sustainability, such as the company’s ability to retain top workers (Tourish, 2016). The core of everything that follows is a strong basis of leadership. Jeffers and his followers faced numerous challenges because they lacked this link and connection.
Jeffers adopted poor communication skills, which was the downfall of the company. When Jeffers called his assistant manager to discuss her leaving, he wondered why she had not talked about her disappointment with him earlier. Maryann remembered every time she tried, and he brushed her off. Since effective communication is a key element for professional achievements, a lack of it meant that Jeffers and Fortuga Artisans were destined to fail. Maryann also informed Jeffers that several of his vice presidents had planned to leave and that a number of artists had decided not to renew their contract. Maryann said that his conduct had affected the loyalty of the internal stakeholders within the company. He rarely talked to them, did not welcome their opinions or ideas, made vacuum decisions, ignored business norms, and did not respect the personal space of anyone. He was also a chauvinist.
Therefore, there was a lack of communication since the boss did not listen to the workers’ complaints. For example, when Jeffers’ assistant wanted to talk with his leadership about their discontent, he waved it away. This indicates that Jeffers employed a leading style in which workers should not be consulted. The high turnover rates in the company are attributable to a lack of confidence in Jeffers’ leadership methods. For example, the assistant to Jeffers voiced issues that subordinates decided to withdraw or not renew contracts because they lacked confidence in his leadership. The lack of confidence in leadership and poor passion for work is characteristic of a company with a transitive strategy (McMahon, 2021). The fact that workers are given instructions and not consulted on their interests and concerns shows a lack of motivation.
The success of an organization relies heavily on its leadership’s efficacy. The leader must create a working environment to support the achievement of corporate ambitions and objectives. Great leader utilizes styles, methods, and strategies that may improve the interest and commitment of their subordinates towards achieving corporate objectives. The leader at the Fortuga Artisans Company had not cultivated an environment that promotes devotion to organizational objectives via his style, approach, and strategy. The problems at Fortuga included lack of effective internal communication, lack of motivation, high employee turnover rates, and lack of confidence in the present leadership. The subordinates believed that their opinions did not matter to the leader since they were brushed off when they attempted to express their concerns.
Furthermore, there was a lack of communication since the leader was unaware of the subordinates’ concerns and their resignation plans. The workers developed little confidence in Doug’s abilities to manage the company and thus either opt-out of renewing the contract or completely resigning. The lack of trust and contempt are the primary causes of a competing company’s employee turnover and employee disputes. The difficulties at Fortuga may be linked to the kind of leadership style, approach, and strategy used by autocratic leaders. In this way, the management maintains the authority to make decisions (Mahdayanthi & Astuti, 2020). This leadership style is characterized by few discussions with subordinates and lesser passion, which could explain the issues.
References
Mahdayanthi, M. E., & Astuti, M. (2020). Effect of autocratic leadership style, communication, and work motivation towards employee performance PT. Candi Jaya Amerta. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 6. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.2020.v6.293
McMahon, T. P. (2021). Communication strategy. Fostering Employee Buy-In Through Effective Leadership Communication, 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195122-9-13
Tourish, D. (2016). Leadership from a communication perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.13[supanova_question]